Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2015 (12) TMI 485 - AT - Service TaxDenial of refund claim - maintainability under Section 35F - Mandatory pre deposit - Held that - We have gone through the provisions of newly inserted Section 35F of the Central Excise Act 1944 read with Section 86 of Finance Act 1994. In the said provisions the refund claim already sanctioned is not a subject matter. Therefore the requirement of pre-deposit of 7.5% of the duty does not arise. With these observations we hold that the appeal is maintainable before this Tribunal. - Decided in favour of assessee.
The judgment concerns the maintainability of an appeal under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and Section 86 of the Finance Act, 1994. The refund claim initially sanctioned was later set aside. The Tribunal found that the appeal is maintainable as the requirement of pre-deposit does not arise in this case. The appeal is directed to be listed in due course.
|