Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2015 (12) TMI 486 - AT - Service TaxImposition of penalty - Benefit of Section 80 - Manpower supply service - Held that - Respondent is engaged in supply of manpower through contractors for the purpose harvesting and supplying the sugar to the sugar factories. This activity as already been held by this Tribunal as not covered under the Manpower Requirement or Supply Agency Services under Section 65 (105)(k) of the Finance Act 1994. In this view of the matter it would be amount to gross injustice to impose the penalty. - Decided against Revenue.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order extending the benefit of Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994 to the respondent. The Tribunal found that the respondent's activity of supplying manpower for harvesting and supplying sugar was not covered under relevant sections, leading to the dismissal of the appeal by the Revenue.
|