Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + HC Indian Laws - 1935 (11) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1935 (11) TMI 28 - PATNA HIGH COURTExtract: .......efendant though it may operate to the detriment of the revenue. I see no reason for interfering with the order passed in the present case or for departing from the usual practice of this Court not to interfere in revision with interlocutory orders. The application is therefore dismissed with costs. Hearing fee two gold mohurs. Varma, J. 6. I agree.
|