Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + HC Indian Laws - 1935 (10) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1935 (10) TMI 11 - HC - Indian LawsExtract: .......ree-holder and its intention obviously is to say that in such circumstances the Secretary of State will not really be governed by the provisions of Clauses 1 and 2, but will be entitled to the benefit of the doctrine of priority. I therefore see no reason to interfere with the order of the lower Court. The revision petition is dismissed with costs.
|