Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + Commission Indian Laws - 2018 (3) TMI Commission This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2018 (3) TMI 1996 - Commission - Indian LawsAbuse of dominant position in the market for manufacture and sale of scooters in India - Contravention of the provisions of Sections 3 and 4 of Competition Act, 2002 - Restriction on the purchase of oils and consumables - Restriction on the purchase of accessories - Refusal to deal with any competing product - Restriction on Annual Maintenance Contract (AMC), Extended Warranty (EW) and Road Side Assistance (RSA) - Deliberate deduction from dealer’s account to fund advertising expenses - Compulsory off-loading of stock and slow moving models - Compulsory billing of merchandise - Restriction regarding the sale of batteries - Exclusive arrangements with financers and insurance partners - Re-sale price maintenance and discount control mechanism - Fixation of limits of geographic operation - Enforcing hub and spokes arrangement by negatively evaluating dealers - Termination of dealership and refusal to take back stock? Whether the OP enjoys a dominant position in any relevant market. HELD THAT:- The Commission is prima-facie satisfied that the restrictions imposed by the OP for sale of oil, lubricants and batteries are unfair and in contravention of Section 4(2) (a)(i) of the Act. Similarly, the condition for mandatory purchase of accessories, merchandise items, forceful billing of slow moving vehicles, compulsory deduction of advertising expenses, restrictions on insurance and finance options, making purchase of AMC, EW and RSA contingent upon purchase of booklets from Corporate India Warranties (I) Private Limited, termination of dealership without prior notice and refusal for stock buyback appear to be unfair and suggest prima-facie contravention of Section 4(2) (a)(i) of the Act. The Commission is also prima-facie satisfied that the Dealership Agreement has been concluded with the said supplementary obligations which, by their nature or commercial usage, have no connection with the subject of the contract. Thus, the Commission is of the prima-facie view that the conduct of the OP merits examination under Section 4(2) (d) of the Act - The Commission also notes that the mandatory requirement imposed by the OP on its dealers for purchase of oil and consumables, genuine accessories, AMC, EW and RSA, advertising services, merchandise items, batteries, insurance and finance options, from designated sources; resale price maintenance and discount control mechanism; allocation of any area or market for the disposal or sale of the goods; and exclusive supply agreement/refusal to deal; also appear to be in the nature of anti-competitive restraints covered under section 3(4) of the Act. Prima-facie, a case of contravention of the provisions of Section 4 and 3(4) of the Act is made out against the OP. The Director General (DG) is directed to cause an investigation to be made into the matter and to complete the investigation within a period of 60 days from receipt of this order - Nothing stated in this order shall tantamount to expression of final opinion on the merits of the case and the DG shall conduct the investigation without being swayed in any manner whatsoever by the observations made herein. The Secretary is directed to send a copy of this order along with the information and the documents filed therewith to the Office of the DG forthwith.
|