Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
2016 (4) TMI 1463 - HC - Indian LawsSmuggling - recovery of 6 kgs of opium from possession of petitioner - Report of chemical examiner having not been received within a period of 180 days which expired on 29.1.2016 - whether challan without the report of chemical examiner presented within a period of 180 days could be said to be a challan as per the legal requirements of Section 173 (2) Cr.P.C. read with Section 173 (5) Cr.P.C. dis-entitling the accused for the default bail under Section 167 (2) Cr.P.C? HELD THAT - A Division Bench of this Court in VARINDER SINGH SANDHU AND ORS. VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB 2015 (11) TMI 1900 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT has held that where an application for extension of time is filed by the PP before the expiry of 180 days for report of FSL having not been received the accused would not be entitled to the benefit of Section 167 (2) Cr.P.C. This Court in RAVINDER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA 2014 (9) TMI 1284 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT has granted the default bail under Section 167 (2) Cr.P.C. when the cognizance had been taken by the trial Court without having obtained report of chemical examiner observing that a report not accompanied by chemical examiner report would be a no charge-sheet. The Andhra Pradesh High Court in Matchumari China Venkatareddy and others Vs. State of AP 1993 (3) TMI 391 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT has held that filing of charge sheet under Section 173 (2) Cr.P.C. was not complete unless it is accompanied by the papers contemplated under Section 173 (5) Cr.P.C. The Bombay High Court in Sunil Vasantrao Phulbande and another Vs. State of Maharashtra 2002 (2) TMI 1362 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT has granted benefit of Section 167 (2) Cr.P.C. to accused holding that incomplete charge sheet cannot be treated as police report at all as contemplated under Section 173 (2) Cr.P.C. Following the judgment of Apex Court in Satya Narain Musadi s case 1979 (9) TMI 197 - SUPREME COURT which has been followed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh in Matchumari China s case and by Calcutta High Court in Raghubirsaran Jain and another Vs. State and another 1995 (6) TMI 203 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT it is opined that the petitioners herein should have been released in peculiar circumstances of this case as indefeasible right had accrued to them under Section 167 (2) Cr.P.C. on presentation of incomplete challan without the report of chemical examiner and the prosecution agency having not availed the benefit of Section 36 A (4) of the NDPS Act within a period of 180 days. In a case under the NDPS Act a right of bail under Section 167 (2) Cr.P.C. of an accused can be defeated by the prosecution agency by availing the remedy under Section 36 A (4) of the NDPS Act subject to the fulfillment of the statutory requirement of Section 36 A (4) of the NDPS Act which is to be considered in each case on individual merits by the concerned trial Court/ Special Judge. The right under Section 167 (2) Cr.P.C. cannot be defeated by merely filing an incomplete challan. The facts and circumstances of Narendra Kumar Amin s case 2015 (1) TMI 1456 - SUPREME COURT are not applicable to the facts of the present case as the challan presented in the said case fulfilled all the requirements of Section 173 (2) Cr.P.C. In the present case without availing the remedy under Section 36 A (4) of the NDPS Act an attempt had been made by the prosecution agency to defeat the rights of the petitioner by presenting challan within a period of 180 days without the report of chemical examiner which report had not been received even till the date of filing of the present revision petition. The order passed by the Special Judge Ludhiana dated February 3 2016 dismissing the application under Section 167 (2) Cr.P.C. is hereby set aside. Petitioners are ordered to be released on bail on their furnishing bail bonds/ surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court - petition allowed.
|