9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2023 (10) TMI 1485 - HC - GSTSeeking to prevent the arrest in connection with an investigation and summon issued - it is submitted that as of today the petitioner cannot claim any apprehension since no statement as yet has been recorded under Section 70 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 and that the apprehension is misplaced - HELD THAT - Issue notice. List on 28.11.2023.
The Delhi High Court, presided over by HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, addressed a writ petition (W.P.(CRL) 3137/2023) filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, alongside Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., 1973. The petitioner sought a writ of Mandamus to prevent arrest in connection with an investigation (DGGI/INV/GST/3370/2023-INV-O/OPRDG-DGGI-HQ-DELHI) and was summoned to appear before authorities on October 3, 2023.
The petitioner's counsel, Mr. Ashish Mohan, argued there was a "real apprehension" of arrest due to the co-Director's prior arrest and subsequent release in Surat, Gujarat, after four months of incarceration. Despite the petitioner's willingness to cooperate with the investigation, the counsel expressed concerns about potential arrest. Conversely, Mr. Harpreet Singh, representing the respondent, contended that the petitioner had not appeared in response to the summons on the specified date, and instead, a counsel appeared seeking more time. He argued that the petitioner's apprehension was "misplaced" as no statement had been recorded under Section 70 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The court issued a notice, with Mr. Harpreet Singh accepting it, and allowed three weeks for a reply. The matter is scheduled for listing on November 28, 2023.
|
