9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Interpretation of trust deed for tax exemption under section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Analysis: The appeal pertains to the assessment year 1972-73 concerning a registered trust governed by a Trust Deed dated 12th Nov., 1952. The trust's primary objective was to provide temporary accommodation to Gujarati Hindu pilgrims visiting Hardwar. The income of the trust was derived from board and lodging charges received from the pilgrims. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) assessed the trust as an Association of Persons (AOP) due to specific clauses in the Trust Deed indicating a private religious trust. The trust claimed exemption under section 11, contending that the income was not taxable. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC) observed that exemption under section 11 was subject to section 13, which restricted tax exemption for property held under trust for private religious purposes. The AAC referred to a Supreme Court case to support the interpretation of charitable purposes benefiting a section of the public. The AAC found that the trust did not cater exclusively to a particular caste but to all pilgrims, thus not qualifying as a private religious trust. The AAC annulled the assessment made by the ITO, leading the Department to appeal. During the appeal, the Departmental Representative argued that the trust only provided facilities to a limited section of society, citing specific clauses in the Trust Deed. However, the counsel for the assessee argued that the clauses related to the establishment and management of the Dharamshala did not conflict with section 11. Citing the Supreme Court's decision in a similar case, the counsel emphasized that the trust did not qualify as a private religious trust due to the insignificant percentage of donor families benefiting from the trust's facilities. Upon hearing the arguments, the Appellate Tribunal noted several legal precedents supporting the assessee's contention. The Tribunal highlighted decisions from various High Courts and the Supreme Court emphasizing that a trust could be of public charitable nature even if control over the trust property was retained by the settlors. The Tribunal also addressed the discretion vested in trustees to spend trust amounts and reiterated that an object beneficial to a section of the public qualified as an object of general public utility. The Tribunal found no evidence to support the ITO's claim that preferential treatment was given to donors in utilizing the trust's facilities. The Tribunal upheld the AAC's decision, concluding that the trust did not fall under the category of a private religious trust and was eligible for tax exemption under section 11. In conclusion, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the trust's eligibility for tax exemption under section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
|
