HC allowed the appellate remedy under Section 107 of CGST Act, ...

Legal Challenge Upheld: CGST Section 107 Appeal Permitted with Pre-Deposit, Limitation Period Extended to July 10th

May 17, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

HC allowed the appellate remedy under Section 107 of CGST Act, 2017, permitting the Petitioner to file an appeal by 10th July, 2025 with pre-deposit. The appeal, if filed within the stipulated timeframe, will not be dismissed on limitation grounds and will be heard on merits. The court explicitly left open the issue regarding the validity of the impugned notifications, making the order subject to the Supreme Court's decision in the pending SLP. The petitioner was granted a belated opportunity to challenge the order while preserving the right to contest notification validity in future proceedings.

View Source

← Previous Next →

HC allowed the appellate remedy under Section 107 of CGST Act, ...

Legal Challenge Upheld: CGST Section 107 Appeal Permitted with Pre-Deposit, Limitation Period Extended to July 10th

May 17, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

Refund of pre-deposit - period of limitation - limitation period would start not from the date of deposit but from the date of the decision by Commissioner (Appeals) - AT

HC held reassessment proceedings initiated u/s 148 were invalid due to statutory limitation u/s 149. The original notice was set aside for lacking mandatory approvals...

Time limitation for filing appeal - Suffice to say that an appeal under Section 107 is subject to a 'prescribed period of limitation' and a 'condonable period of...

Invocation of extended period of limitation - activity of direct selling agent on commission basis - The non-payment of service tax was purely a bona fide unawarenss...

The order dismissing the appeal due to non-payment of the mandatory pre-deposit amount u/s 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was challenged. The court relied on a...

Extended period of limitation - Recovery of service tax - service being taxable but the liability has not been discharged by the appellant - the Department has wrongly...

Liability to pay Service Tax when the main contractor has already paid - The Tribunal cited a circular stating sub-contractors are liable to pay Service Tax separately....

The case involved the issue of pre-deposit during the pendency of appeal, applicability of Section 11B and unjust enrichment, and eligibility for interest on refund of...

Recovery of erroneous refund - amount paid by the appellant’s Chennai Unit towards the pre-deposit in connection with an appeal filed arising out of order in Tuticorin...

Exemption from Pre-deposit - The petitioner argued that their request for exemption from pre-deposit was wrongly rejected, and they challenged the jurisdiction of...

Waiver of pre-deposit - requirement u/s 129E - The case revolved around the appellant's failure to fulfill the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under section 129E of...

Interest on differential duty by invoking extended period of limitation - Invoking the extending period of limitation is not sustainable and the demand of interest by...

Issue of invoking an extended period of limitation for service tax assessment in cases involving interpretation of legal provisions. It establishes that mere...

Demand of service tax - Extended period of limitation - In place of invoking extended period in cases of suppression of fact with an intent to evade payment of duty or...

Manner of making Pre-deposit before filing an Appeal - Utilization of Input Tax credit (ITC) available in the Electronic Credit Ledger (ECL) - The petitioner approached...

Quick Updates: