9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2025 (5) TMI 1531 - AT - Service TaxClassification of service - tour operator services - activity carried out by the Appellant up to 31.06.2012 in assisting of Haj Pilgrims - HELD THAT - The Tribunal has considered the issue in the matter of M/s AL-Hussain India Hajj Umrah Services Management 2016 (7) TMI 1715 - SC ORDER wherein it is the held that The appellant is engaged in providing services in connection with religious trips Hajj and Umrah mainly to Mecca Madina Mina Muzdalifa etc. Both the sides agree that the issue involved in the present appeals has been considered by this Tribunal in the case of M/s. Cox Kings India Ltd. Others v. Commissioner of Service Tax New Delhi 2017 (4) TMI 852 - CESTAT MUMBAI The Tribunal had decided the issue in favour of the appellant. Following the precedent decision of the Tribunal these appeals are also allowed with consequential relief if any. Conclusion - Assistance in performing religious rites related to Haj and Umrah is not taxable as tour operator service under the Finance Act 1994 prior to 01.07.2012. Appeal allowed.
1. ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDERED
The core legal question considered by the Tribunal was whether the activity carried out by the appellant in assisting Haj pilgrims up to 30.06.2012 falls under the category of 'tour operator' services as defined under Section 65(115) read with Section 65(105)(n) of the Finance Act, 1994. This issue was relevant for determining the appellant's liability to pay service tax for the period 2008-09 to 2012-13. Additionally, the Tribunal considered the applicability of exemption notifications effective from 01.07.2012 and the relevance of judicial precedents and service tax rules such as the Place of Provision of Service Rules, 2012 and Export of Service Rules, 2005. 2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS Issue: Classification of Assistance to Haj Pilgrims as 'Tour Operator' Service Relevant Legal Framework and Precedents: The key statutory provisions under consideration were Section 65(115) and Section 65(105)(n) of the Finance Act, 1994, which define 'tour operator' services. The appellant's activity involved assisting pilgrims in performing religious rites related to Haj and Umrah, which was not a defined taxable service under the Finance Act until 30.06.2012. The exemption for such assistance was introduced effective 01.07.2012 through Notification No. 25/2012-ST dated 20.06.2012. Judicial precedents heavily relied upon included the Supreme Court and Tribunal decisions in M/s Cox & Kings India Ltd., All India Haj Umrah Tour Organizer Association Mumbai Vs. Union of India, and M/s Al-Hussain India Hajj & Umrah Services Management. These decisions clarified that assistance in religious pilgrimages like Haj and Umrah does not constitute 'tour operator' service liable to service tax prior to the exemption notification. Court's Interpretation and Reasoning: The Tribunal noted that the appellant's activity was assisting pilgrims in religious ceremonies, which is distinct from commercial tour operator services. The Tribunal referred to the decision in M/s Al-Hussain India Hajj & Umrah Services Management, where it was held that such services are not taxable as 'tour operator' services for the period up to 30.06.2012. The Tribunal emphasized that the issue is no longer res integra, meaning it has been conclusively settled by higher judicial authority. Key Evidence and Findings: The appellant's submissions and documentary evidence demonstrated that the services rendered were limited to assistance in religious rites, without the commercial characteristics of tour operator services. The revenue's concession that the issue is no longer res integra further supported the appellant's position. Application of Law to Facts: Applying the legal framework and precedents, the Tribunal concluded that the appellant's services prior to 01.07.2012 did not attract service tax under the 'tour operator' category. The exemption notification effective from 01.07.2012 further reinforced this position. Treatment of Competing Arguments: The revenue initially demanded service tax along with interest and penalty for the period 2008-09 to 2012-13, contending that the appellant's services fell under 'tour operator' service. However, the Tribunal noted that the revenue's authorized representative admitted the issue was no longer open for dispute. The appellant's reliance on binding precedents and statutory notifications was accepted, leading to the rejection of the revenue's demand. Conclusions: The Tribunal held that the appellant's activity of assisting Haj pilgrims up to 30.06.2012 does not constitute a taxable 'tour operator' service under the Finance Act, 1994. Accordingly, the demand for service tax, interest, and penalty was set aside. 3. SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGS The Tribunal expressly relied upon the following crucial legal reasoning from the precedent in M/s Al-Hussain India Hajj & Umrah Services Management: "The appellant is engaged in providing services in connection with religious trips Hajj and Umrah mainly to Mecca, Madina, Mina, Muzdalifa etc. Both the sides agree that the issue involved in the present appeals has been considered by this Tribunal in the case of M/s. Cox & Kings India Ltd. & Others v. Commissioner of Service Tax, New Delhi. The Tribunal had decided the issue in favour of the appellant. Following the precedent decision of the Tribunal, these appeals are also allowed with consequential relief, if any." Core principles established include:
Final determinations on the issue were that the appellant was not liable to pay service tax on assistance to Haj pilgrims for the period 2008-09 to 2012-13, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief in accordance with law.
|
