Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 1999 (9) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1999 (9) TMI 213 - CEGAT, MUMBAIExtract: .......hin the meaning of Rule 57-I. The question as to whether the declaration made, without demarkable intend to evade duty would justify the invocation of extended period has already been answered by the Supreme Court in its judgment in Pushpam Pharmaceuticals v. C.C.E., 1997 (78) E.L.T. 649 and other judgments. 5. emsp Application therefore dismissed.
|