Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise 2007 2007 2007 (4) Central Excise - 2007 (4) This

Law	-- All -- GST Income Tax Benami Property Customs Corporate Laws Securities / SEBI Insolvency & Bankruptcy FEMA PMLA Service Tax Central Excise CST, VAT & Sales Tax Wealth tax Indian Laws
Court	-- Any -- Supreme Court SC Orders / Highlights High Court Appellate Tribunal Tribunal Appellate authority for Advance Ruling Advance Ruling Authority National Financial Reporting Authority Competition Commission of India ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY Commission Central Government Board DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court Commissioner / Appellate Authority Other
Citation	--Year-- 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 1963 1962 1961 1960 1959 1958 1957 1956 1955 1954 1953 1952 1951 1950 Upto 1949 - -Volume- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 -
Landmark	Nil - N/A Referred in >= 3 Cases Referred in >= 4 Cases Referred in >= 5 Cases Referred in >= 10 Cases Referred in >= 15 Cases Referred in >= 25 Cases Referred in >= 50 Cases Referred in >= 100 Cases
Order by	TMI Citation Date of Decision

Advanced Search Options

Central Excise - Case Laws

Showing 201 to 220 of 246 Records

• 2007 (4) TMI 84 - CESTAT, CHENNAI
  

  Cenvat/Modvat - Alleged that appellant used common inputs i.e plastic crates, FO used in the exempted and dutiable final products but didn't maintain separate accounts for it and accordingly demand were made alongwith interest and penalty - Held that (i)In plastic crates demand not sustainable, (ii)In case FO demand sustained

  ---

• 2007 (4) TMI 83 - CESTAT, CHENNAI
  

  Cenvat/Modvat - Department contended that appellant activity of packing of photographic film from smaller to larger pack is manufacturing activity and accordingly demand and penalty imposed - Held that department contention was correct and demand and penalty sustained

  ---

• 2007 (4) TMI 82 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD
  

  Confiscation and penalty - Alleged that appellant had confiscated the good(MS waste and scrape) and accordingly fine and penalty imposed - Held that allegation was not correct and fine and penalty not sustainable

  ---

• 2007 (4) TMI 79 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI
  

  Cenvat/Modvat credit - Alleged that appellant is not entitle for credit on the ground that the plain sheets were used by the appellants in the machineries after cut to size - Held that allegation was not correct and accordingly allow the appeal

  ---

• 2007 (4) TMI 77 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI
  

  Confiscation and penalty - Revenue contended that appellant has imported old and used machine and therefore, they liable for confiscation and benefit of EPCG license disallowed and penalties were imposed - Held that revenue contention is not correct and dismissed the revenue appeal

  ---

• 2007 (4) TMI 76 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI
  

  Cenvat/Modvat credit - Department contended that appellant had not done any manufacturing process on the goods and knitted fabrics, knitted garments and blankets and accordingly not entitle for credit - Held the department contention was correct

  ---

• 2007 (4) TMI 74 - CESTAT, KOLKATA
  

  Interest - Alleged that appellant liable to pay interest seem to have voluntarily paid the additional duty amount under sub-section (2B) of Section 11A of the CEA,1944 - Held that allegation was not correct and appellant not liable to pay any interest

  ---

• 2007 (4) TMI 73 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD
  

  Reversal of credit - Department contended that appellant is required to reversed the credit on the quantity of input didn't utilize into the final product - Held that the department contention is not correct and allowed the appeal

  ---

• 2007 (4) TMI 72 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI
  

  Reversal of credit - Department contended that appellant is required to reversal of cenvat credit taken on inputs used in the manufacture of P or P medicines proposed to be destroyed - Held that department contention is not correct and it is set aside

  ---

• 2007 (4) TMI 71 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD
  

  SSI Exemption - Department contended that appellant can't simultaneously avail SSI exemption for the product cleared in their own brand name and avail the cenvat credit for the goods cleared on payment of duty on the brand name of others - Held that department contention is correct and allowed

  ---

• 2007 (4) TMI 70 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI
  

  Cenvat/Modvat- Appellant contended that bed-sheets and blankets are inputs and accordingly availed cenvat credit on it - Department contended that the said input is final products and not entitle for cenvat credit and accordingly demand were made alongwith penalty - Held that the department contention was correct

  ---

• 2007 (4) TMI 69 - CESTAT, MUMBAI
  

  Exemption - Department contended that the appellant goods (Diabinese) not entitle for exemption in terms of Notification Nos. 122/86 and 9/94 - Held that department contention is not correct and the said good entitle for exemption

  ---

• 2007 (4) TMI 68 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI
  

  Demand - Revenue contended that 'commission' and 'extra' are to be added in the assessable value of the goods cleared under the invoices - Held that revenue contention was correct and added it to the assessable value

  ---

• 2007 (4) TMI 67 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI
  

  Cenavt/Modvat - Revenue contended that respondent was trading in modvatable inputs by merely slitting them sell in the market and paid less duty on the clearance of slit strips and accordingly demand were made alongwith penalty - Held that revenue contention was not correct and set aside demand and penalty

  ---

• 2007 (4) TMI 66 - CESTAT, MUMBAI
  

  Cenvat/Modvat - Department contended that cenvat credit on the inputs and capital goods were received by assessee and subsequently cleared to the power plant and used for manufacture of electricity was not admissible - Held department contention was not correct and credit admissible

  ---

• 2007 (4) TMI 65 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD
  

  Cenvat/Modvat credit - Department contended that no modvat credit allowed on the packing materials and as antistatic oil was admissible under Rule 57A - Held that department contention was not correct and allow the credit on packing material

  ---

• 2007 (4) TMI 64 - CESTAT, CHENNAI
  

  Cenvat/Modvat - Revenue contended that assessee had made misdeclaration about the good and accordingly disallow the credit and demand were made alongwith interest and penalty - Held that revenue contention was correct and credit was not allowed

  ---

• 2007 (4) TMI 63 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI
  

  Confiscation, fine and penalty - Revenue contended that the there is excess quantity of inputs in factory premises was made for clandestine removal and accordingly demand were made alongwith fine and penalty - Held that the revenue contention was not correct and allow the appeal

  ---

• 2007 (4) TMI 62 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD
  

  Confiscation and penalty - Alleged that appellant is cleared from the premises without preparing document and without payment of duty to the job worker and accordingly demand were made alongwith fine and penalty - Held that allegation was correct and demand, fine and penalty sustained

  ---

• 2007 (4) TMI 58 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI
  

  Stay/Dispensation of pre-deposit – Revenue contended that appellant once availed the credit they not entitle for benefit of Notification No. 30/2004 and accordingly demand were made alongwith penalty – Held that appellant reversing the credit utilised and pre-deposit and penalty waived

  ---

1 ....78910111213