Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Case Laws
Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise SC Central Excise - SC
Law
Court
Citation -
Landmark
Order by
 

 

Central Excise - Supreme Court - Case Laws

Showing 61 to 80 of 3172 Records

  • 2017 (1) TMI 641 - SUPREME COURT

    M/s Dharampal Satyapal Ltd. Versus U.O.I

    Recalling of the order - adjudication - Appeal against the decision Union of India And Another Versus Dharampal Satyapal And Others 2013 (10) TMI 238 - DELHI HIGH COURT - Held that - the appellants on the previous occasion had submitted that the matter should be thrashed out before the Settlement Commission, but today it is argued that the matter requires to be adjudicated by the adjudicating authority as a show cause notice was issued. A plea of....... + More


  • 2017 (1) TMI 483 - SUPREME COURT

    Commissioner Central Excise, Bangalore Versus M/s. United Spirits Ltd. & Another

    Manufacture - excisability of food flavours - Valuation - inclusion of amount paid for Royalty - the food flavours were prepared by mixing of various essences (odoriferous substances) - The liquor manufacturers under the manufacturing agreement would use food flavours in such proportions as identified by the respondent and the blending proportion was maintained as a trade secret of the respondent - The royalty paid to the respondent by the liquor....... + More


  • 2017 (1) TMI 482 - SUPREME COURT

    Mahalakshmi Cable Industries Versus Commissioner

    Denial of refund claim - deposit under protest - period of limitation - SLP against the decision in the caaseof Mahalakshmi Cable Industries Versus Commissioner of Central Excise 2015 (3) TMI 658 - DELHI HIGH COURT - Held that - delay condoned - SLP dismissed........ + More


  • 2017 (1) TMI 481 - SUPREME COURT

    Commissioner Versus HCL Peripherals

    Whether Touch Screen Kiosks are eligible for exemption u/not. 6/02 as computers - appeal against the decision in the case of HCL PERIPHERALS Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., CHENNAI 2008 (4) TMI 195 - CESTAT, CHENNAI - Held that - The Civil Appeal is dismissed on the ground of delay - decided against appellant........ + More


  • 2017 (1) TMI 419 - SUPREME COURT

    M.J. Pharmaceutical Ltd. Versus Commissioner

    Curative Petition - Denial of CENVAT Credit - Imposition of penalty - the decision in thecase of 2015 (5) TMI 447 - SUPREME COURT contested - Held that - We have gone through the Curative Petition and the relevant documents. In our opinion, no case is made out within the parameters indicated in the decision of this Court in Rupa Ashok Hurra v. Ashok Hurra and Another 2002 (4) TMI 889 - SUPREME COURT - petition dismissed - decided against petition....... + More


  • 2017 (1) TMI 418 - SUPREME COURT

    Commissioner Versus Wrigley India Ltd.

    Abatement - the decision in the case of COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., BANGALORE-III Versus WRIGLEY INDIA LTD 2007 (8) TMI 136 - CESTAT, BANGALORE contested - Held that - the findings of fact recorded by all the authorities below are against the Department. No question of law arises for our consideration - appeal dismissed - decided against appellant........ + More


  • 2017 (1) TMI 417 - SUPREME COURT

    Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd. Versus Commissioner

    Set off on duty paid on the treated paper and treated fabric - the decision in the case of BOMBAY BURMAH TRADING CORPORATION LTD. Versus COMMR. OF C. EX., PUNE-I 2008 (5) TMI 637 - CESTAT MUMBAI , contested - Held that - the appellant could not give any satisfactory evidence to show that the same product in respect of which duty was paid was used as an intermediary product for the manufacture of the final product - appeal dismissed - decided agai....... + More


  • 2016 (12) TMI 1672 - SUPREME COURT

    Commissioner Versus Goyal Proteins Ltd.

    CENVAT credit - goods manufactured out of common inputs without payment of duty as well as on payment of duty - the decision in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise Versus Goyal Proteins Ltd. 2014 (2) TMI 1321 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT contested, where it was held that when the respondent-assessee had been furnishing regular returns on monthly basis disclosing therein about clearing goods manufactured out of common inputs without payment of du....... + More


  • 2016 (12) TMI 1060 - SUPREME COURT

    Sterlite Opticals Technologies Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise

    Benefit of N/N. 125/84-CE - EPCG scheme - Rule 8(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 - commitment of fraud - Held that - the learned counsel shall restrict their arguments to the points framed hereinabove. They shall file their written notes of submissions within four weeks hence. ....... + More


  • 2016 (12) TMI 471 - SUPREME COURT

    Sheshmal Hiralal Shah Versus Commissioner

    Manufacture - marketability - process of cold-rolling of stainless steel patta/pattis - the decision in the case of M/s. Gujarat Industries & Others Versus Commissioner of Central Excise-I, Ahmedabad 2015 (12) TMI 743 - SUPREME COURT contested - Held that - We have carefully gone through the review petitions and the connected papers. We find no error much less apparent in the order impugned - The review petitions are, accordingly, dismissed. ....... + More


  • 2016 (11) TMI 1430 - SUPREME COURT

    Union of India Versus Modi Springs Pvt. Ltd.

    Jurisdiction - Export of goods - Failure to furnish ARE 1 and proof of export of goods as required under Rule 19 of the Rules - the decision in the case of M/s NVR Forgings Versus Union of India and others 2016 (5) TMI 7 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT referred, where it was held that the order in appeal as well as revisionary order had been passed by the officers of the same rank which is not permissible as per law - Held that - the decision in ....... + More


  • 2016 (11) TMI 818 - SUPREME COURT

    Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax, Ghaziabad Versus Anupam Kamboj

    The High Court while dismissing the appeal has not ascribed any reasons whatsoever, except stating that no substantial question of law arises for consideration. In our opinion, the High Court is required to give some reasons indicating that no substantial question of law is involved - In the absence of the reasons, we set aside the order dated 12.02.2016 and remand the matter to the High Court for fresh consideration - SLP disposed off....... + More


  • 2016 (11) TMI 626 - SUPREME COURT

    Commissioner Versus Aristo Pharmaceuticals Limited

    The decision in the acse of CCE, Bhopal Versus M/s Aristo Pharmaceuticals Limited 2009 (12) TMI 989 - CESTAT NEW DELHI contested - Held that - the issue that falls for determination in this appeal is clearly covered against the Revenue in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai v. M/s. Vikram Ispat Ltd. 2016 (5) TMI 442 - SUPREME COURT - appeal fails and is accordingly dismissed ....... + More


  • 2016 (11) TMI 625 - SUPREME COURT

    Commissioner Versus PSL Corrosion Control Services Ltd.

    The decision in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, DAMAN Versus PSL Corrosion Control Services Ltd. 2010 (10) TMI 1122 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT contested - Held that - Since the tax effect involved in the instant appeal is negligible, the appeal is dismissed on this ground alone, leaving the question of law open. ....... + More


  • 2016 (11) TMI 568 - SUPREME COURT

    Maharshi Commerce Ltd. Versus Commissioner

    Abatement under sub-section (3) of Section 3A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 - the decision in the case of Maharshi Commerce Ltd. Versus Commr. of Cus. & C. Ex., Hyderabad-III 015 (7) TMI 1159 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT contested - appeal dismissed. ....... + More


  • 2016 (11) TMI 567 - SUPREME COURT

    Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur Versus Vidarbha Veneer Industries Ltd.

    Recovery from company in liquidation - Held that - even if this appeal is allowed and the Excise Department is held entitled to recover the amount, it would not be in a position to recover any amount from the company in liquidation. Therefore, we do not deem it proper to go into the merits of this appeal because of the aforesaid reason - appeal dismissed........ + More


  • 2016 (11) TMI 566 - SUPREME COURT

    Commissioner Versus Baccarose Perfume & Beauty Products Ltd.

    Manufacture - the decision in the case of DEPUTY COMMR. OF CUS. Versus BACCAROSE PERFUME & BEAUTY PRODUCTS LTD. 2010 (1) TMI 437 - Gujarat HIGH COURT contested - Held that - The special leave petitions are dismissed, both on the ground of delay, as also on merits. ....... + More


  • 2016 (11) TMI 565 - SUPREME COURT

    Commissioner Versus Lime Chemicals Ltd.

    Demand - Undervaluation - the decision in the case of LIME CHEMICALS LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., BELAPUR 2007 (12) TMI 380 - CESTAT, MUMBAI contested - Held that - Since the tax effect is low, we are not inclined to entertain these appeals. - appeal dismissed. ....... + More


  • 2016 (11) TMI 564 - SUPREME COURT

    Commissioner Versus Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages P. Ltd.

    Valuation - MRP based valuation - Rental charges on bottles and crates - the decision in the case of HINDUSTAN COCA-COLA BEVERAGES P. LTD. Versus COMMR. OF C. EX., ALLAHABAD 2006 (3) TMI 392 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI contested - Held that - tax effect is nominal. Therefore, the appeals are dismissed on this ground. The question of law is left open. ....... + More


  • 2016 (11) TMI 563 - SUPREME COURT

    Commissioner Versus Saraogi Paper Mills Pvt. Ltd.

    CENVAT credit - CVD - The decision in the case of M/s. Saraogi Paper Mills Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Patna 2007 (8) TMI 761 - CESTAT KOLKATA contested - Held that - appeal dismissed. ....... + More


4........
 
 
 
Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version