HC held that the communication dated 29 November 2018 was a ...

Tax Refund Claim Quashed: Authority Directed to Issue Final Order Within 8 Weeks, Ensuring Fair Hearing and Open Contentions

May 10, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax HC

HC held that the communication dated 29 November 2018 was a preliminary, non-conclusive communication regarding a potential tax refund and not a statutory order. While quashing the impugned communication dated 16 June 2022, the court directed the tax authority to pass a final order determining the refund claim within eight weeks, providing the petitioner an opportunity to be heard, with all substantive contentions remaining open for consideration.

View Source

← Previous Next →

HC held that the communication dated 29 November 2018 was a ...

Tax Refund Claim Quashed: Authority Directed to Issue Final Order Within 8 Weeks, Ensuring Fair Hearing and Open Contentions

May 10, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Refund of accumulated input tax credit - relevant date for the purpose of considering the limitation u/s 54 - The High Court addressed this issue by directing the...

Claim of Refund - Post GST, on demand, appellant paid service tax under reverse charge basis and claim refund as the same is eligible as Input Tax Credit under the...

HC allowed the petition challenging tax authorities' rejection of revised income tax return. The court found that the petitioner received land acquisition compensation...

The High Court examined the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer (AO) and the prescribed income-tax authority to issue notices u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. It held...

Refund of duty paid - filing of refund claim before the wrong jurisdiction - if the adjudicating authority was of the view that the appellant has not filed refund claim...

Refund of duty paid - filing of refund claim before the wrong jurisdiction - if the adjudicating authority was of the view that the appellant has not filed refund claim...

HC allows petitioner's claim for input tax credit (ITC) refund on zero-rated services, holding that registration without specific service category details does not...

The appellant paid service tax voluntarily under reverse charge mechanism before the GST regime. The adjudicating authority denied refund, holding that service tax was...

Refund of unutilized CENVAT Credit - surrender of registration - the appellant is entitled for refund claim of unutilized cenvat credit lying in their cenvat credit...

The HC allowed the petition, quashing the impugned order and directing respondents to process the petitioner's refund claims for unutilized Input Tax Credit under...

The appellant is eligible for interest on delayed refund from 22.02.2008 till the refund payment date, calculated at 12% per annum rate. CESTAT allowed the appeal,...

This Court directed the respondents to process the petitioner's refund claims and grant a refund of the excess tax amount collected from the petitioner and deposited by...

Refund of Input Tax Credit - tax on the export of eggs - nil rated commodity - petitioner had instead of opting for exports without payment of tax, had opted for the...

Refund of excess tax paid - The refund claim under 11B was rejected by the Original Authority on the ground that the claim cannot be modified by the appellant to include...

HC allowed the petition, directing re-adjudication of ITC refund claims for February 2021 to February 2022. The court held that Notification No. 14/2022 is clarificatory...

Quick Updates: