Tax Management India. Com
                            Law and Practice: A Digital eBook ...
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Case Laws Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Manuals Short Notes News Articles Highlights
        Home        
 
Case Laws
Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise SC Central Excise - SC This
Law
Court
Citation -
Landmark
Order by
 

 

Central Excise - Supreme Court - Case Laws

Showing 81 to 100 of 3282 Records

  • 2017 (10) TMI 1333

    Classification of goods - Chewing Tobacco - Held that - There are no merits in these appeals - Admission is refused and the civil appeals are, accordingly, dismissed........ + More


  • 2017 (10) TMI 965

    Condonation of delay - Site formation service - contract for production, Drilling & Associates Work in Underground Sindesar Khurd Mine - the decision in the case of M/s. Teknomin Construction Ltd. Versus C.C.E. & S.T., Jaipur 2017 (4) TMI 704 - CESTAT NEW DELHI contested - Held that - delay condoned - appeal admitted........ + More


  • 2017 (10) TMI 660

    Excisability - agarbathi perfume also called as odoriferous compound which is used in manufacture of agarbathis sold in the market - Whether the Board s Circular No.495/61/99-CX.3, dated 22.11.1999 exempts payment of excise duty on perfumery compound manufactured by the respondent? - Held that - The Board vide its circular clarified that such odoriferous compound mixed with dough is not excisable - The circular clarifies that odoriferous substanc....... + More


  • 2017 (10) TMI 215

    SSI exemption - use of brand name - Notification No. 8/2003-CE - exclusion of export turnover - the decision in the case of M/s Himgiri Plastics, Sh. Joginder Kumar Talwar, Partner, Sh. Sanjeev Talwar, Partner, M/s Himalayan Poly Colours, Smt. Neelam Talwar, Partner, M/s Himalayan Poly Colours, Smt. Rimmi Talwar, Partner - M/s Himalayan Poly Colours, Sh. Puneet Talwar Versus CCE, Delhi 2016 (11) TMI 228 - CESTAT NEW DELHI contested, where it was ....... + More


  • 2017 (10) TMI 135

    Misdeclaration of value - Interest - Penalty - Rule 6 of the Valuation Rules, 2000 - the decision in the case of Tycon Automation Private Ltd., Shri Dinesh Kumar Bhardwaj, Tycon Automation Pvt. Ltd. Versus C.C.E., Noida 2016 (12) TMI 1456 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD contested - Notices issued........ + More


  • 2017 (9) TMI 1712

    Benefit of concessional rate of duty - sale of cement - cement sold to the agencies on MRP basis, but in some cases selling directly to the consumers which includes the Government agencies, builders, institutions and individuals - export to Nepal - Held that - Appeal(s) are admitted........ + More


  • 2017 (9) TMI 1256

    Condonation of delay - Maintainability of appeal - project import - the decision in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax Versus Kei Industries Limited 2017 (4) TMI 942 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT contested - Held that - delay condoned - leave granted........ + More


  • 2017 (9) TMI 706

    Exemption Notification 8/97 dated 1.3.1997 - eligibility for benefit - imported paper cones used for winding of yarn - the decision in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune-II Versus Abhishek Cotspin Mills Ltd. 2016 (8) TMI 979 - CESTAT MUMBAI contested, where it was held that paper cones are packing materials, and were permitted to import the same as such without payment of duty - Held that - the decision in the above case upheld - ap....... + More


  • 2017 (9) TMI 705

    Condonation of delay - 100% EOU - denial of eligibility for concession - demand of duty - the decision in the case of M/s Winsome Yarns Ltd., Shri Manish Bagrodia, M.D., Shri N.K. Maheshwari, Director and Shri S.K. Sharma, V.P. Versus CCE, Chandigarh 2016 (10) TMI 608 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH contested, where it was held that appellant eligible to claim exemption - Held that - delay not condoned - The appeals are dismissed on the ground of delay as we....... + More


  • 2017 (9) TMI 620

    Evasion of duty - CENVAT credit - omission of Rule 56A - Held that - The ingredient of the offence is the evasion. The omission of a procedural rule for availing the credit cannot in any manner affect the said charge. The prosecution cannot be deprived of opportunity to prove evasion which by itself is an offence. In this view of the matter, there was no justification for the High Court to quash the charge merely on the ground of Rule 56A having ....... + More


  • 2017 (9) TMI 619

    Condonation of delay - Refund claim - the decision in the case of Commissioner, Service Tax Commissionerate, Noida Versus M/s Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd. 2017 (9) TMI 590 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT contested - Held that - Delay condoned - Leave granted........ + More


  • 2017 (9) TMI 618

    SSI Exemption - Clubbing of clearances - Clandestine removal of goods - the decision in the case of M/s. Nova Industries (P) Ltd. Versus CCE- Chandigarh 2015 (5) TMI 99 - CESTAT NEW DELHI contested - Held that - Application for exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned order is allowed - Issue notice on the application for condonation of delay as well as in appeal........ + More


  • 2017 (9) TMI 416

    Condonation of delay - Cement and clinker - whether the cement cleared by the appellant to the customers covered under serial No.1C of the N/N. 4/2006-CE dated 01.03.2006 read with Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977 and whether such consumers can be categorized as institutional or industrial consumer? - the decision in the case of Ambuja Cements Ltd. Versus C.C.E. Raipur 2017 (1) TMI 1130 - CESTAT NEW DELHI conte....... + More


  • 2017 (9) TMI 415

    Denial of the benefit of N/N. 6/2006, dated 1-3-2006 - anchor rings and load spreading plates - the decision in the case of Rakhoh Enterprises Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune 2016 (11) TMI 1207 - CESTAT MUMBAI contested - Held that - In deciding the issue of entitlement of the respondent Assessee to the benefit of exemption under the Notification in question (No.6/2006 dated 1st March, 2006) the Tribunal has relied upon the decision o....... + More


  • 2017 (8) TMI 1428

    Valuation of differential duty - quantification of differential duty based on comparable value of similar products manufactured and cleared by others - Held that - There is no cogent reason to entertain the appeal. The judgment impugned does not warrant any interference - appeal is dismissed........ + More


  • 2017 (8) TMI 1413

    Whether an assessee who has accepted the classification under the Central Excise Tariff Act is liable to pay duty as per the said classification without insisting on a notice under Section 11A of the Act? - Held that - Section 11A of the Act enjoins a duty on the concerned Central Excise Officer to show cause an assessee as to why the assessee should not pay the duty not levied or not paid or short levied or short paid or erroneously refunded, as....... + More


  • 2017 (8) TMI 1091

    Lapsing of credit of duty lying unutilised with the manufacturer from a specified date - decision in the case of M/s SML Isuzu Ltd. & Anr. V.E. Commercial Vehicle Ltd. & Anr. Versus Union of India & Anr 2016 (7) TMI 1074 - DELHI HIGH COURT contested, where it was held that Scope of judicial review in respect of fiscal legislation is limited to the extent of determining whether it is outside the legislative competence of the legislatur....... + More


  • 2017 (8) TMI 883

    Condonation of delay - Maintainability of appeal - case of Revenue is that the appeal is not maintainable insofar as it relates to determination of question having relation to rate of duty - the decision in the case of Thejo Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commr. OF C. Ex., Chennai-II 2015 (7) TMI 1229 - MADRAS HIGH COURT contested - Held that - The special leave petition is dismissed on the ground of delay........ + More


  • 2017 (8) TMI 822

    Classification of goods - Integrated Fixed Wireless Terminals CDMA-2000-1X (ETS 2288) - whether appellant is eligible to avail benefit of exemption notification no.6/2003-CE (Sr.no.264) for the CDMA WLL phones manufactured by them? - the decision in the case of M/s. Surana Telecom Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Goa 2016 (12) TMI 1388 - CESTAT MUMBAI contested, where it was held that benefit of notification 6/2002-CE needs to be exten....... + More


  • 2017 (8) TMI 821

    Classification - worn out Silver targets - Whether to be classifiable under Chapter Subheading No. 7101.80 attracting 16% rate of duty as per Department or under Chapter Subheading No. 7101.31 which attracts NIL Rate of Duty - the decision in the case of Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. Versus C.C.E., NOIDA 2016 (8) TMI 446 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD contested, where it was held that worn out Silver Targets are classifiable under chapter subheading No. 70....... + More


5........
 
 
 
Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.