Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws 1998 1998 1998 (12) Indian Laws - 1998 (12) This

Law	-- All -- GST Income Tax Benami Property Customs Corporate Laws Securities / SEBI Insolvency & Bankruptcy FEMA PMLA Service Tax Central Excise CST, VAT & Sales Tax Wealth tax Indian Laws
Court	-- Any -- Supreme Court SC Orders / Highlights High Court Appellate Tribunal Tribunal Appellate authority for Advance Ruling Advance Ruling Authority National Financial Reporting Authority Competition Commission of India ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY Commission Central Government Board DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court Commissioner / Appellate Authority Other
Citation	--Year-- 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 1963 1962 1961 1960 1959 1958 1957 1956 1955 1954 1953 1952 1951 1950 Upto 1949 - -Volume- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 -
Landmark	Nil - N/A Referred in >= 3 Cases Referred in >= 4 Cases Referred in >= 5 Cases Referred in >= 10 Cases Referred in >= 15 Cases Referred in >= 25 Cases Referred in >= 50 Cases Referred in >= 100 Cases
Order by	TMI Citation Date of Decision

Advanced Search Options

Indian Laws - Case Laws

Showing 21 to 22 of 22 Records

• 1998 (12) TMI 567 - SUPREME COURT
  

  The learned single Judge failed to exercise the jurisdiction vested in him while non-suiting the appellant. It, therefore, appears appropriate to us to allow this appeal, set aside the order of the learned single Judge and remit the matter to the High Court for a fresh decision of the regular second appeal and the cross objections on their own merits. The appeal, therefore, succeeds and is allowed. The RSA and cross objections are remitted to the High Court for fresh disposal on merits in accordance with law.

  ---

• 1998 (12) TMI 345 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA (DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE - REVIS
  

  Foreign Travel Tax - Delayed payment - Penalty

  
  
  ... ...
  ... ... ..... s were to make the payment together with interest on the amount of tax not so paid for the period for which such tax has been delayed that penalty of not less than one fifth but which may extend three times of the amount of tax not so paid within the prescribed time limit also becomes payable after due observance of the principles of natural justice by way of issue of show cause notice and upon adjudication. 6. emsp In view of the above discussions imposition of penalty under Section 38(3) of the Finance Act, 1979 cannot be assailed. Rule 10A of the FTT Rules, 1979 brought into force w.e.f. 1-9-1994 specifically provides for imposition of penalties for delayed submission of the FTT returns which shall not be less than Rupees two thousand but which may extend to Rupees twenty thousand. Hence, imposition of penalties of Rs. 2,500/- and Rs. 17,000/- also cannot be assailed. 7. emsp In the result, the revision applications devoid of merits are rejected. It is ordered accordingly.

  ---

12