Case Laws |
Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Section Wise 2006 2006 (6) This
|
Advanced Search Options
Case Laws
Showing 481 to 490 of 490 Records
-
2006 (6) TMI 11 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI
Central Excise - Job worker paid differential duty on raw material to the appellant and issued supplementary invoice - No case of suppression or misstatement of facts - Credit of differential duty paid on supplementary invoice is allowable
-
2006 (6) TMI 10 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI
Central Excise - Provisional Assessment - No appeal was filed against rejection order - Refund of excess duty paid to be adjusted against demand of duty - Case remanded
-
2006 (6) TMI 9 - CESTAT, BANGALORE
Service Tax - Consulting Engineer service - Work contract - Contract for supply of turbo power pack and spares along with design, installation and commissioning service - Not liable to service tax as composite contract
-
2006 (6) TMI 8 - CESTAT, BANGALORE
Central Excise - The demand cannot be confirmed on the basis of documents prepared by the assessee to obtain higher bank loan
-
2006 (6) TMI 7 - CESTAT, MUMBAI
Central Excise - Cenvat/Modvat on capital goods - Essential parts and accessories of specified goods and goods related to manufacture of final product are entitled for credit
-
2006 (6) TMI 6 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (BANGALORE)
Central Excise – Drawback (1) Petitioner failure to realize sale proceeds within specific time (2) Proceeding related to penalty and recovery of drawback (3) Exemption
-
2006 (6) TMI 5 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI
Central Excise – SSI Exemption – Brand name ... ... ... ... ..... se for denial of the SSI benefit on the ground that the said mark is of another person, viz. Hansu Control Ltd. In this view of the matter, the duty demands after denial of the SSI benefit will be only restricted to the product supplied with the mark Hansu and that would reduce the demands to l 15,409 as agreed by both sides. This amount of duty is confirmed and the other amounts as confirmed by the lower authorities sets aside. 5. As regards penalties, arrived at, in this case it is to be observed and found that the issue of eligibility to SSI units an exemption, on the question of using another person marks is and was a vex question of law and facts and has been settled recently by the decisions of the Apex Court. In this view of the matter we cannot find any reason to uphold or call for any penalties as arrived at in this case. 6. The penalties are therefore set aside and duty demand of Rs. 1, 15,409/- confirmed and the appeals disposed of accordingly. Pronounced in Court.
-
2006 (6) TMI 3 - CESTAT NEW DELHI (LB)
Service Tax – Clearing and Forwarding agents (1) Procuring/booking orders (2) Business auxiliary service (3) Sale/Purchase of goods
-
2006 (6) TMI 2 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI (LB)
Service Tax – C & F Agent – Clearing or Forwarding or both services are covered under the definition of C & F Agent for the purpose of service tax – Interpretation of law
-
2006 (6) TMI 1 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI
Service Tax –Photography –Appellant claimed that cost of paper and other materials consumed during the photography service is eligible for deduction –Service contract have no element of sale of goods
....
|
|