Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Article Section
Home Articles Income Tax C.A. DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
← Previous Next →

Intangible assets- true meaning is required to be considered and not nomenclature given like ‘goodwill’.

Submit New Article
 
Intangible assets- true meaning is required to be considered and not nomenclature given like ‘goodwill’.
By: C.A. DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
October 31, 2012
  • Contents

Intangible assets- true meaning is required to be considered and not nomenclature given like ‘goodwill’.

Earlier article:

An article titled “Goodwill is intangible asset, eligible for depreciation allowance”, was web hosted on this website at

http://www.taxmanagementindia.com/visitor/detail_article.asp?ArticleID=1916

In that article author had discussed about various assets which are acquired in case of purchase, acquisition, statutory transferes, or vesting of any business as a going concern in any scheme etc. In the article with help and reference of another article titled “A lesson from supreme courts judgment in CIT v. Hooghly Mills Co. Ltd 2006 (11) TMI 137 - SUPREME COURT” webhosted at link http://www.taxmanagementindia.com/wnew/print_Article.asp?ID=204

 it was also suggested  various assets should be specifically described instead of clubbing various assets under the head ‘GOODWILL’, as is a general practice. The discussion is found under heading “Amount described as goodwill”

Recent judgment of Delhi High Court:

AREVA T & D INDIA LTD. Versus THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX 2012 (4) TMI 79 - DELHI HIGH COURT, X

In this case while considering provisions relating to depreciation allowance on intangible assets the court considered assets like Business information, contracts, records etc. After detailed consideration the Court came to conclusion that such assets are “intangible assets” of the business and are eligible for depreciation

In this case the mode of acquisition of business was under ‘slump sale agreement’.

Under such agreement the assessee, acquired a transmission and distribution business as a going concern for a lump sum consideration of Rs.44.7 crores.

The net tangible assets were valued at Rs.28.11 crores and the balance Rs. 16.58 crores was allocated by the assessee / acquirer towards acquisition of bundle of “business and commercial rights” being business information; business records; contracts; employees etc, and described them collectively and compendiously as “goodwill”.

The assessee claimed that the said “business and commercial rights” were an “intangible asset” which were like tool of trade with which assessee carried business and hence  eligible for depreciation u/s 32(1)(ii).

The claim so made was rejected at all lower stages that is by the AO, CIT(A) & Tribunal.

The main ground for rejection was that depreciation was not allowable on “goodwill”.

Assessee preferred an appeal under section 260A and on such appeal the High Court reversed orders of lower authorities including Tribunal and allowed depreciation holding that these assets were intangible assets. The Court observed that S. 32(1)(ii) allows depreciation on “intangible assets” which are defined to mean “know-how, patents, copyrights, trademarks, licences, franchises or any other business or commercial rights of similar nature”. Applying the principle of ejusdem generis, the expression “business or commercial rights of similar nature” need not answer the description of “knowhow, patents, trademarks, licenses or franchises” but must be of similar nature as the specified assets. The specified intangible assets are not of the same kind and are clearly distinct from one another. The nature of “business or commercial rights” cannot be restricted to only the aforesaid six categories of assets but can be of the same genus in which all the aforesaid six assets fall and form part of the tool of trade of an assessee facilitating smooth carrying on of the business. The intangible assets, viz., business claims; business information; business records; contracts; employees; and knowhow, are all assets, which are invaluable and result in carrying on the transmission and distribution business by the assessee without any interruption. These intangible assets are comparable to a license to carry out the existing transmission and distribution business of the transferor. In the absence of the aforesaid intangible assets, the assessee would have had to commence business from scratch and go through the gestation period whereas by acquiring the aforesaid business rights along with the tangible assets, the assessee got an up and running business. Accordingly, the intangible assets acquired under slump sale agreement were in the nature of “business or commercial rights of similar nature” and eligible for depreciation u/s 32(1)(ii) (Techno Shares & Stocks Ltd. Versus The Commissioner of Income Tax IV 2010 (9) TMI 6 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (SC) followed)

(Q whether goodwill per se is eligible for depreciation u/s 32(1)(ii) left open).

Goodwill:

In earlier article the author had already discussed that ‘goodwill’ as such can also be considered as intangible asset eligible for depreciation. This is because ‘goodwill’ is a name given in commercial world, in fact it represents various intangible assets of business which help businessman to carry business easily, effectively and more economically, and profitably. (But profitability is not necessity because profitability depend on many economic factors)

In CIT vs. Smifs Securities 2012 (8) TMI 713 - SUPREME COURT Ltd decided by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has also held that ‘goodwill’ is intangible asset, as discussed in earlier article.

True character of assets:

True character of assets, and their role in a business is required to be considered and not only the nomenclature or description given in agreement, scheme or accounts. If assets are intangible assets with which assessee carry business then such assets can be eligible for depreciation. 

**********************************************************

 

By: C.A. DEV KUMAR KOTHARI - October 31, 2012

 

 

 
← Previous Next →
what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Highlight: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

News: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

Highlight: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

Highlight: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Non-payment of service tax - maintenance and repair charges - appellants had knowingly and deliberately shown the repair charges as job work charges to mislead about their taxability - demand confirmed.

Highlight: BAS - execution of the project of smart card for vehicle registration – implementing the SOC-VRC project - The fact that the Government has outsourced some part of the work and paid certain consideration for such outsourced work, does not make the activity subject to service tax.

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Cess paid instead of SGST

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Circular: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg.

News: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg. - Trade Notice

Highlight: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg. - Various amendments are made in Chapter-4 of Hand Book of Procedures 2015-2020.

Forum: GST rates on mobile recharge business

Circular: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg.

Forum: import purchase

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Forum: 3B mistake

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector – reg.

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map || ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version