Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2004 (3) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2004 (3) TMI 702 - CESTAT, MUMBAIExtract: .......e, I hold that the reduction in penalty imposed on the respondents as ordered by the Commissioner (Appeals) for procedural infractions does not call for any interference, nor is there any reason to impose any separate penalty on Mr. Rao. 7. emsp In the circumstances, I hold that the Revenue appeal is devoid of merits. Accordingly I reject the same.
|