2011 (5) TMI 914 - SUPREME COURT

Whether any of the findings recorded by the High Court on the issue of entitlement for land in lieu of land acquired suffers from perversity and thus, warrants interference by this Court?

Whether the NWDT Award provided for any entitlement of major sons to allotment of agricultural land, and if not, whether the judgment in Narmada Bachao Andolan –I could have been considered as a precedent in Narmada Bachao Andolan –II?

Whether the High Court has rightly interpreted the terms and conditions of the R & R Policy, as the High Court has proceeded with the assumption that the R & R Policy provides that major sons of oustees i.e. the “large land owning families” and those who had been “part of the bigger family” would be entitled for allotment of agricultural land?