Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + HC Central Excise - 2014 (3) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2014 (3) TMI 1002 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURTDenial of refund claim - Petitioner Company had made a request for clearance of the consignment as “returned consignment” without payment of Customs Duty, the Customs Authority insisted on treating the consignment as “fresh import” - application for rebate had initially been returned to the petitioners under cover of a letter dated 26th August, 2011, whereas customs duty was paid on 6th September, 2011 - Held that:- Petitioners claimed exemption under notification No. 94/96 CUS dated 16th December, 1996. For availing benefit of the said notification, the Assistant Commissioner had to be satisfied that the goods which were imported were the same goods that had earlier been exported and further the importer had paid customs duty equal to the export benefit availed at the time of export of the concerned goods. - Since export of goods had been made along with claim for rebate of Cenvat duty of ₹ 92,391/-, and the importer could not prove that rebate had not been granted by the Central Excise authorities, the amount along with interest was charged as customs duty. The goods were released on payment of such customs duty - May be, at the material time the petitioners could not prove non-receipt of the claim for rebate and there was urgency in clearance of goods for which the petitioner paid the amount of the rebate claimed. Such payment was obviously made in the expectation that the petitioner would get the claim. If the claim had not been disbursed, there could be no question of realization of customs duty and customs duty, if realized would necessarily have to be refunded. Imported consignment was assessed at nil customs duty, accepting the contention of the petitioners that the same articles had been sent back. However, the amount of the refund claimed was realized by the customs authorities before allowing clearance of the consignment. May be, the petitioners were themselves negligent in not drawing the attention of the customs authorities to the return of their claim application. Perhaps, the petitioner should have objected to the realization of the amount refund of refund claimed, on the ground that the claim application had been returned. - If no customs duty was in fact payable by the petitioners, but duty realized on the premises that the petitioners had claimed rebate, the respondent customs authorities would be obliged to refund the amount realized through mistake on being satisfied that no rebate of Central Excise duty had actually been allowed. - refund amount shall positively be released within two months from the date of communication of this judgment and order. - Decided in favour of assessee.
|