Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com   
Home Case Index 2012 (4) TMI Income Tax Tri Income Tax + Tri
← Previous Next →
  • Login

User Login
Username  
Password  
Stay sign in     

New User / Regiser    -    Forget password



Renfro India (I) (P.) Ltd. Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, 10(3) - 2012 (4) TMI 470 - ITAT MUMBAI


Extract:-
Confirmation of the penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) by CIT (A) as on the date of filing of return no judicial pronouncement was available in his favour of assessee assessee contested that appellant had disclosed all the details with respect to claim u/s. 10B in the computation of income and notes thereon and the said claim was as per Form 56G issued by the Chartered accountant Held that - Availability/non-availability of a particular pronouncement on a particular date cannot be the basis for imposing penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - deduction has to be allowed in respect of three eligible units and loss of the fourth 10A unit has to be set off against the normal business income - Provision of s. 271(1)(c) are valid when there exists concealment of the particulars of the income of the assessee or the assessee have furnished inaccurate particulars of his income - no information given in the return was found to be incorrect or inaccurate in favour of assessee.


 

← Previous Next →

 


what is new what is new

Latest

Featured

Experts

Subscription

More Options

Communication


|| About us || Contact us || Feed Back || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map || || ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Website