New User / Regiser - Forget password
Renfro India (I) (P.) Ltd. Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, 10(3) - 2012 (4) TMI 470 - ITAT MUMBAI
Confirmation of the penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) by CIT (A) as on the date of filing of return no judicial pronouncement was available in his favour of assessee assessee contested that appellant had disclosed all the details with respect to claim u/s. 10B in the computation of income and notes thereon and the said claim was as per Form 56G issued by the Chartered accountant Held that - Availability/non-availability of a particular pronouncement on a particular date cannot be the basis for imposing penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - deduction has to be allowed in respect of three eligible units and loss of the fourth 10A unit has to be set off against the normal business income - Provision of s. 271(1)(c) are valid when there exists concealment of the particulars of the income of the assessee or the assessee have furnished inaccurate particulars of his income - no information given in the return was found to be incorrect or inaccurate in favour of assessee.