Home Case Index All Cases Money Laundering Money Laundering + HC Money Laundering - 2017 (8) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2017 (8) TMI 1713 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURTRejection of prayer for discharge of the petitioner - exoneration of the petitioner by the Disciplinary Committee - whether the exoneration would render the allegations against him in the impugned prosecution groundless so as to justify his discharge at this stage? - HELD THAT:- The role of the petitioner is not restricted to mere certification as to the nature of business of the accused borrowers as claimed by the Committee in its reports dated 8th February, 2016. He had been employed by the accused borrowers to prepare projected financial statements of the firms and there is ample materials on record to show that such projected financial statements were based on forged and fabricated documents and had been generated to create a false impression with regard to the financial viability of the said firms. Such financial statements were kept on record by the principal accused, that is the branch manager, Atanu Kr. Mitra, as a facile cover-up to justify his unauthorized extension and/or enhancement of cash credit facilities and other financial benefits to the borrowers in utter disregard to prudent banking procedure and his permissible lending limits thereby causing wrongful loss to the bank. It is nobody’s case that the instant prosecution was initiated on the finding of the disciplinary authority which has been set aside by a superior authority. On the other hand, the instant prosecution and the proceeding under the Chartered Accountants Act have completely different scope and arena of enquiry and adjudication. While the former involves a prosecution into allegations of conspiracy with a public servant to misappropriate public funds of a bank, the latter is restricted to professional misconduct alone. The findings of the Disciplinary Committee by no stretch of imagination can be said to be binding on the criminal court where the accusation is to be proved on the basis of evidence adduced before it in accordance with law - The Committee was not at all concerned with the allegations of criminal conspiracy and/or criminal misconduct which are the material issues in the impugned prosecution. Thus, no reliance could be placed on the findings of the Committee to negate the substantial materials on record which give rise to a strong suspicion as to the involvement of the petitioner in the alleged offences - the prayer for discharge of the petitioner from the instant case was rightly turned down. The petitioner, however, shall be at liberty to raise all just defences in the course of trial of the instant case in accordance with law. Petition disposed off.
|