Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + AT Companies Law - 2018 (1) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2018 (1) TMI 431 - AT - Companies LawPetition pending before NCLT since 2006 - Held that:- Section 422 of the Companies Act 2014 expects the NCLT to dispose of the petition in three (3) months and here, more than a decade has passed. In such circumstances, we do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned orders which have been passed. The above impugned orders are speaking for themselves and it is apparent that the Appellants were not permitted amendments or impleadments for reasons recorded and no fault can be found with these orders. In such petition of 2006 which is being dragged even after a decade, such lack of promptness as referred above cannot be entertained. Appellants is trying to show that Responders were responsible for the delay in the matter and according to him, the Respondents attending the matter at times causing delay and when the matter reaches crucial stage, suddenly, the Respondents appear and seek time on various counts. It is stated by him that because of this, the Company Petition is being delayed. If the Respondents are resorting to any delaying tactics, it would be for the learned NCLT to take suitable steps so that the matter is not delayed because of delaying tactics adopted by any of the parties. We are not going into the general statements being made. We are concerned with the specific details of the present impugned orders. Going through them, we find that this appeal does not merit admission. On the face of the record, there is no reason to interfere in the impugned order which have been passed.
|