Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2024 (1) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2024 (1) TMI 592 - CESTAT BANGALORELevy of penalty under Section 114A of CA - Suppression of facts or not - whether penalty is to be imposed when the appellant has accepted the classification and paid the entire duty along with penalty much before the issuance of the show cause notice? - HELD THAT:- It is an admitted fact that the goods were correctly described in the relevant documents except for the classification being inadvertently mentioned as 9031 instead of 9016. It is also a fact that till 2007, the rate of duty under both the Headings was same. The documents including the invoices from the foreign supplier which were placed before the Customs Authorities also contained correct description namely precision ‘balances of sensitivity of 5 cg declared as parts of weighing equipment’. It is also on record that without contesting the classification, the appellant had immediately paid the entire differential duty along with interest much prior to the issuance of the show cause notice. Therefore, the question of alleging suppression in the present case does not arise. The decision relied upon by the authorities in the case of UNION OF INDIA VERSUS M/S RAJASTHAN SPINNING & WEAVING MILLS AND COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE VERSUS M/S. LANCO INDUSTRIES LTD. [2009 (5) TMI 15 - SUPREME COURT] is not applicable inasmuch as that was the case of clear suppression of facts. In the present case, as already discussed, description of goods was not suppressed. In the present case, the appellant had paid the differential duty in 2009 and the notice was issued only in 2011 to appropriate the amounts and impose penalty. The Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of CC VERSUS POWERICA LTD. [2011 (9) TMI 665 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] held that If in law there is a prohibition for initiation of the proceedings to recover the duty and penalty after it is paid before the issue of show cause notice, certainly in such a proceedings which is not maintainable, question of imposing penalty would not arise. In other words, if duty and penalty is paid even before the issue of show cause notice and the said fact is informed to the proper officer, he shall not initiate any proceedings to recover the duty and interest, much less for imposition of penalty. The penalty set aside - appeal allowed.
|