Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2024 (3) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2024 (3) TMI 500 - CESTAT KOLKATAScope of SCN - vague SCN - absence of specific demand of service tax under a particular service - Service tax on the Insurance commission received from Bajaj Alliance - service tax on reimbursements received by the appellant - service tax on TDS refund - interest - penalty. Vague SCN - HELD THAT:- The service tax of Rs.2,69,401/- has been demanded from the Appellant on the Appellant on the taxable value of Rs.22,77,358 received by them for the years 2006-07 to 2009-10. It is observed that neither the SCN dated 14.10.2011 nor the Order-in-Original dated 29.06.2012 has mentioned the specified category service under which the service tax has been demanded. In the absence of specific demand of service tax under a particular category of service, that the demand of service tax is not sustainable. This view has been held by Tribunal Hyderabad in the case of SYNIVERSE MOBILE SOLUTIONS PVT LTD., (EARLIER TRANSCIBERNET INDIA PVT LTD.) VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX, HYDERABAD – IV [2023 (6) TMI 463 - CESTAT HYDERABAD], wherein it has been held Tribunals have been consistently holding that it is essential for the Show Cause Notice issuing authority to clearly indicate the sub-clause under which the service tax in question would fall. It is a settled law that the defect in the notice cannot be cured by the observations of the adjudicating authority or appellate authority. Accordingly, the demand of service tax along with interest and penalty confirmed in the impugned order is not sustainable as the SCN fails to specify the category of service under which the demand has been raised. Demand of service tax on the Insurance commission received from Bajaj Alliance - demand confirmed on the ground that the Appellant failed to substantiate that Bajaj Alliance for whom the Appellant has worked has paid the Service Tax - HELD THAT:- Board has issued Circular F. No. B11/1/2002-TRU, dated 1-8-2002, which provides that the Service tax would be paid by the Insurance Company and not the insurance agent. Relying on the Circular cited above, it is held that no service tax is payable by the Appellant on the amount received as Insurance commission. Demand of service tax on the reimbursements received by the appellant - HELD THAT:- The Appellant submits that they have acted as pure agent, as such, the invoices have been raised in the name of the principal and the exact amount has been reimbursed. The ledger would envisage that the exact amount spent on behalf of the principal has been reimbursed. Accordingly, it is held that the demand of service tax confirmed on the reimbursed expenses, where the Appellant acted as a pure agent is not sustainable. Demand of service tax on the TDS refund - HELD THAT:- There is no provision under the service tax act to demand service tax on TDS refund. Accordingly, it is held that the demand confirmed in the impugned order on this count is not sustainable. Interest and penalty - HELD THAT:- Since the demand itself is not sustainable, the question of demanding interest and imposing penalty does not arise. Accordingly, it is held that the demand of service tax along with interest and penalty confirmed in the impugned order is not sustainable. The impugned order set aside - appeal allowed.
|