Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAR GST - 2024 (5) TMI AAR This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2024 (5) TMI 544 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, TELANGANALevy of GST - export of services or not - place of supply - Intermediary services or independent service - Marketing/ Recruitment/ Referral Consultant by the Applicant to foreign universities/ colleges on principal to principal basis - HELD THAT:- A perusal of the terms of the underlying agreements between the Applicant and foreign colleges and university amply clarifies that the Applicant is not an agent of foreign colleges and university, as it cannot and does not represent itself as an agent or broker or a similar person to enter into a contract, supply or transaction with third party i.e. the prospective students, on behalf of foreign colleges and university. In fact, neither the Applicant has any role or responsibility for services provided by foreign colleges and universities to the prospective students nor it can influence or interfere in the selection process of prospective students thus rendering itself an alien to the arrangement between the foreign colleges and university, and prospective students. The relationship between the Applicant and foreign colleges and university has been defined, impliedly or explicitly, as of principal to principal. It is also clear that the necessary conditions for qualifying as ‘intermediary’ i.e. presence of three parties and provision of main service with ancillary service by the facilitator acting as an agent or broker, as per Section 2 (13), are not fulfilled by the applicant. The services of ‘marketing/ recruitment/ referral consultant’ are provided by the Applicant to foreign colleges and university on principal to principal basis, with no contractual relationship with prospective students. The Applicant is providing its main service of marketing/recruitment and referral consultant to the foreign colleges/universities, which is independent of the transactions between the foreign colleges/university, and their prospective students. The Applicant cannot be construed to have been facilitating services of the foreign colleges and university to the prospective students as students cannot be construed as service recipients particularly in the absence of consideration flowing from them to the Applicant. Thus, the Applicant cannot be considered as ‘intermediary’ for the purpose of Section 2 (13) of IGST Act. In the instant case, the Applicant (Supplier) is located in India while the recipient of services i.e. foreign colleges and university are located outside India. Since, the activity of the Applicant is an independent service of ‘marketing/ recruitment/ referral consultant’, the same will fall under Section 13 (2) of the IGST Act to determine its place of supply. Accordingly, the place of supply of the services of the Applicant shall be location of recipient of it services i.e. location of foreign colleges and university which is outside India. The activity of the Applicant for foreign college and university should qualify as ‘export of service’ in terms of Section 2(6) of IGST Act provided the payments are received in convertible foreign exchange.
|