Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 1991 (6) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1991 (6) TMI 131 - AT - Customs

Issues: Valuation of imported car based on a similar model, inclusion of accessories in assessable value, consideration of freight charges, imposition of redemption fine.

In this case, the appellant imported a second-hand Toyota Corolla Sedan LE-4-Dr 1985 and the assessment was based on the ex-works price of a 1985 Model Toyota Corolla SR-4-Dr 1600 CC car. The appellant challenged the assessable value determined by the Assistant Collector, arguing that the SR-4-Dr model was superior and the price differential should be considered. The Tribunal found the valuation based on the SR-4-Dr model unreasonable and allowed a US $500 allowance on the reported ex-works price of the SR-4-Dr model for the imported car, considering relative engine capacity and other factors.

Regarding the inclusion of accessories in the assessable value, the appellant claimed that the air-conditioner and radio cassette player were standard equipment, but the Tribunal found that these items were separately charged according to the Red Book official used car catalogue. Hence, the ex-works price of the car was not inclusive of these accessories.

The Tribunal also addressed the consideration of freight charges, agreeing with the appellant that the freight charges from the country of origin, Japan, should have been taken into account in determining the assessable value. However, the claim that the price of accessories should be included in the ex-works price was dismissed.

Lastly, the Tribunal found the imposition of a redemption fine of Rs. 2,000 for a nominal shortfall in the face value of the CCP unjustified and set aside the fine. The appeal was allowed, and the case was remanded to the Assistant Collector for revising the duty based on the Tribunal's order and providing consequential relief to the appellant.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates