Addresses the mechanism for granting tax credit for MAT/AMT paid in excess of regular tax liability by Other than Corporate : Clause 206(13)-(16) of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 115JD of the Income-tax Clause 206 Special provision for minimum alternate tax and alternate minimum tax. - Income Tax Bill, 2025

Clause 206 Special provision for minimum alternate tax and alternate minimum tax. Income Tax Bill, 2025 Introduction Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) and Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) have long been significant mechanisms within the Indian income-tax framework, designed to ensure that entities with substantial book profits or adjusted total income contribute a minimum level of tax, even when their taxable income is reduced by various deductions, incentives, or exemptions. The introduction of Clause 206 in the Income Tax Bill, 2025 , continues this legacy, but with notable refinements and expansions in its scope and application. This commentary focuses specifically on sub-clauses (13) to (16) of Clause 206, which deal with the regime for MAT/AMT tax credit, its carry forward, set-off, and adjustment in case of reassessment or appellate orders. These provisions are then compared in depth with the existing framework u/s 115JD of the Income Tax Act, 1961 . The analysis herein provides a detailed breakdown of the statutory language, legislative intent, operational mechanics, and practical implications for taxpayers, as well as a comparative evaluation highlighting both continuity and divergence between the new and old regimes. Objective and Purpose The legislative intent behind MAT and AMT provisions is to counteract aggressive tax planning that exploits deductions, exemptions, and incentives, resulting in minimal or nil tax liability despite significant accounting profits. The MAT/AMT credit mechanism, as addressed in both Clause 206 (2025 Bill) and Section 115JD (1961 Act), aims to ensure equity by allowing taxpayers to recoup excess MAT/AMT paid during years of low regular tax liability in subsequent years when regular tax liability exceeds MAT/AMT. The credit mechanism thus prevents MAT/AMT from being a sunk cost and aligns the minimum tax regime with principles of fairness and horizontal equity. Sub-clauses (13)-(16) of Clause 206, and the corresponding provisions in Section 115JD, are central to the operationalization of this intent, as they set out the rules for determination, carry forward, set-off, and adjustment of MAT/AMT credit, balancing the objectives of revenue protection and taxpayer relief. Detailed Analysis of Clause 206(13)-(16) of Income Tax Bill, 2025 Clause 206(13): Credit for MAT/AMT Paid This provision establishes the foundational rule for MAT/AMT credit: the taxpayer is entitled to a credit equal to the excess of MAT/AMT paid over the regular tax liability for the relevant tax year. The language difference of the tax paid ... and tax payable ... as per the other provisions mirrors the computational logic in Section 115JD(2) of the 1961 Act. Key points: The credit is available only for the differential amount (i.e., MAT/AMT paid less regular tax payable). It applies to any assessee covered by sub-section (1), which includes both companies (MAT) and other specified persons (AMT), thus broadening the scope compared to the earlier regime. The provision is automatic; once MAT/AMT is paid, the entitlement to credit arises without further conditions. Clause 206(14): Conditions and Limitations on Credit This sub-clause imposes two critical limitations: No Interest on MAT/AMT Credit: Taxpayers are not entitled to any interest on the MAT/AMT credit allowed. This aligns with the principle that MAT/AMT credit is a benefit, not a refundable deposit or advance tax, and is consistent with Section 115JD(3) of the 1961 Act. Foreign Tax Credit Adjustment: If the foreign tax credit (FTC) allowed against MAT/AMT exceeds the FTC admissible against regular tax, the excess is ignored when computing MAT/AMT credit. This prevents double benefit and ensures that FTC does not artificially inflate MAT/AMT credit. The specific cross-reference to section 159(1) or (2) (which correspond to sections 90, 90A, and 91 of the 1961 Act) ensures harmonization with India s tax treaties and unilateral relief provisions. The provision thus addresses both administrative fairness (no interest) and international tax integrity (FTC adjustment). Clause 206(15): Carry Forward and Set-Off of MAT/AMT Credit This sub-clause operationalizes the mechanics of MAT/AMT credit utilization: Set-Off Trigger: Set-off is permitted in years when regular tax liability exceeds MAT/AMT liability. This ensures that MAT/AMT credit is only used when the taxpayer is otherwise subject to higher regular tax. Set-Off Quantum: The quantum of set-off is capped at the excess of regular tax over MAT/AMT for the relevant year, preventing over-utilization. Carry Forward Period: The credit can be carried forward for up to fifteen tax years (aligning with the assessment year in the 1961 Act), ensuring a reasonable window for utilization while preventing indefinite accumulation. This structure is designed to balance taxpayer relief with revenue certainty, and is substantially similar to the carry forward and set-off rules in Section 115JD(4)-(5). Clause 206(16): Adjustment of Credit on Reassessment or Appeal This sub-clause addresses the dynamic nature of tax liability, recognizing that assessments may be modified by appellate, revisionary, or rectification orders. It mandates that the MAT/AMT credit allowed must be correspondingly adjusted if the regular tax or MAT/AMT liability for a year changes due to such orders. Key implications: Ensures accuracy and fairness by aligning MAT/AMT credit with true tax liability as finally determined. Prevents windfall gains or losses arising from subsequent reassessment or appellate orders. Mirrors the language and intent of Section 115JD(6) of the 1961 Act. Practical Implications The practical impact of these provisions is significant for taxpayers subject to MAT/AMT: Cash Flow Management: The ability to carry forward and set off MAT/AMT credit over fifteen years provides substantial relief, allowing taxpayers to better manage cash flows and plan for future tax liabilities. Compliance Requirements: Taxpayers must maintain detailed records of MAT/AMT paid, credit available, set-off utilized, and carry forward balances, as well as monitor changes due to appellate orders. Interaction with Foreign Tax Credit: Multinational taxpayers must carefully compute FTC for both MAT/AMT and regular tax, ensuring that excess FTC is not double-counted in MAT/AMT credit calculations. No Interest Component: The absence of interest on MAT/AMT credit may affect the time value of money for taxpayers, especially if utilization is delayed for several years. Sunset on Carry Forward: The fifteen-year limit is generous but finite, necessitating proactive tax planning to ensure credit is not forfeited due to expiry. From a revenue perspective, these provisions provide certainty and prevent indefinite deferral of tax payments, while also ensuring that the MAT/AMT regime does not become unduly punitive. Comparative Analysis: Clause 206(13)-(16) vs. Section 115JD 1. Scope and Applicability Section 115JD, as originally enacted, applied primarily to non-corporate taxpayers subject to AMT u/s 115JC, including LLPs and other specified persons. Clause 206(13)-(16) of the 2025 Bill, however, applies to all assessees covered by MAT or AMT under Clause 206, including companies, co-operative societies, and other categories as per the new Table. Thus, the 2025 Bill reflects a more unified and comprehensive approach, integrating MAT and AMT credit rules under a single provision. 2. Computation of Credit Both Section 115JD(2) and Clause 206(13) adopt the same computational logic: credit is the excess of MAT/AMT paid over regular tax liability for the year. Both provisions ensure that only the extra tax paid under MAT/AMT is available as credit, precluding double counting or overstatement. 3. Foreign Tax Credit Adjustment Section 115JD(2) (proviso) and Clause 206(14)(b) both address the scenario where FTC allowed against MAT/AMT exceeds FTC allowable against regular tax. Both provide that the excess is to be ignored in computing MAT/AMT credit, thus preventing manipulation of MAT/AMT credit through aggressive use of FTC. The language and intent are substantially similar, though Clause 206(14) references the new section numbers (159(1)/(2)) corresponding to the new Bill s structure. 4. Interest on MAT/AMT Credit Section 115JD(3) and Clause 206(14)(a) both categorically deny any interest on MAT/AMT credit, maintaining revenue neutrality and administrative simplicity. 5. Carry Forward and Set-Off Period Section 115JD(4) and Clause 206(15) both permit carry forward of MAT/AMT credit for up to fifteen years (increased from ten years by the Finance Act, 2017). The set-off rules are also identical: credit can be set off only in years when regular tax exceeds MAT/AMT, and only to the extent of the excess. 6. Adjustment on Reassessment or Appeal Section 115JD(6) and Clause 206(16) both provide for adjustment of MAT/AMT credit in case the tax liability for a year is modified by an order passed under the Act. This ensures that MAT/AMT credit reflects the final tax positions and prevents discrepancies. 7. Exclusions/Non-Applicability While Section 115JD(7) excludes persons who have exercised certain options (e.g., under new concessional tax regimes), Clause 206(18) contains a broader list of exclusions, including specified funds, certain individuals/HUFs with income below a threshold, and others. However, as regards the MAT/AMT credit mechanism itself, both provisions are structurally similar. 8. Structural and Drafting Differences The 2025 Bill reorganizes and modernizes the language, aligning references to new section numbers and updating terminology (e.g., tax year instead of assessment year ). The substantive rules, however, remain closely aligned, reflecting legislative intent to preserve continuity while updating the statutory framework. Ambiguities and Potential Issues While the provisions are generally clear, certain areas may give rise to interpretational or practical challenges: Interaction with Other Tax Regimes: With the proliferation of concessional tax regimes and options under the new Bill, careful attention must be paid to the interplay between MAT/AMT credit rules and eligibility for such regimes. Foreign Tax Credit Complexity: The computation of excess FTC, particularly for multinational groups with complex structures, may require detailed guidance or rules to prevent disputes. Transition Issues: For taxpayers transitioning from the old Act to the new Bill, rules will be needed to address carry forward and utilization of MAT/AMT credit accumulated under the 1961 Act. Administrative Burden: The fifteen-year carry forward necessitates robust record-keeping and tracking, which may be challenging for taxpayers with frequent organizational changes (e.g., mergers, demergers, restructuring). Clause-by-Clause Comparison and Analysis Provision Clause 206 of Income Tax Bill, 2025 Section 115JD Income Tax Act, 1961 Analysis Eligibility for Credit Clause 206(13): Credit for tax paid under MAT/AMT, i.e., tax paid under sub-section (1) in excess of regular tax. Section 115JD(1)-(2): Credit for AMT paid u/s 115JC in excess of regular income-tax. Both provisions operate on the same principle: credit is for the excess MAT/AMT paid over regular tax. Clause 206 is broader, covering both MAT (companies) and AMT (non-corporates), whereas 115JD is limited to AMT for non-corporates. Quantum of Credit Clause 206(13): Difference between MAT/AMT and regular tax. Section 115JD(2): Excess of AMT paid over regular income-tax. Substantially similar in computation methodology. Interest on Credit Clause 206(14)(a): No interest payable on credit. Section 115JD(3): No interest payable on credit. Identical treatment, reflecting the policy that credit is a relief, not a deposit. Foreign Tax Credit Adjustment Clause 206(14)(b): Excess FTC claimed against MAT/AMT over regular tax to be ignored in credit computation. Section 115JD(2) Proviso: Similar adjustment for excess FTC claimed against AMT over regular tax. Both provisions prevent double benefit of FTC. Clause 206 references section 159 (corresponding to sections 90, 90A, 91 under 1961 Act). Carry Forward Period Clause 206(15): 15 tax years from the year credit arises. Section 115JD(4): 15 assessment years from the year credit arises (earlier 10 years). Both provide for a 15-year carry forward period, ensuring ample opportunity for set-off. Terminology differs ( tax year vs. assessment year ), but substance is the same. Set-Off Mechanism Clause 206(15): Set-off allowed to the extent regular tax exceeds MAT/AMT in any year; balance carried forward. Section 115JD(5): Set-off allowed to the extent regular tax exceeds AMT in any year; balance carried forward. Mechanism is identical in both provisions. Variation in Credit Due to Subsequent Orders Clause 206(16): Credit to be increased/reduced in line with changes in tax liability due to orders under the Act. Section 115JD(6): Similar variation in credit as a result of orders under the Act. Both ensure credit reflects final tax liability as determined. Exclusions/Non-applicability Clause 206(18): MAT/AMT provisions do not apply to certain entities (e.g., life insurance companies, those opting for specified alternative tax regimes, small taxpayers below threshold, specified funds). Section 115JD(7): Not applicable to persons opting for specified alternative tax regimes (e.g., 115BAC, 115BAD, 115BAE). Both provide for exclusions, though Clause 206 is more comprehensive, reflecting broader scope. Conclusion Clause 206(13)-(16) of Income Tax Bill, 2025 , represents a clear continuation and consolidation of the MAT/AMT credit regime established u/s 115JD of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The provisions are carefully crafted to ensure that taxpayers subject to minimum tax regimes are not unduly penalized, while also safeguarding the revenue base. The detailed rules for credit determination, carry forward, set-off, and adjustment provide both certainty and fairness, and the fifteen-year window for utilization is generous by international standards. The refinements in drafting and structure reflect the evolving landscape of Indian tax law, particularly in the context of increasing globalization and the proliferation of tax options. However, successful implementation will depend on clear transitional rules, robust administrative procedures, and ongoing judicial and executive guidance to address emergent ambiguities. Full Text : Clause 206 Special provision for minimum alternate tax and alternate minimum tax.