Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
TMI Short Notes

Home TMI Short Notes All Notes for this Source This

Bribery Case - Court rejects CBI prayer for CBI Custody - sends all accused to JC

  • Contents

Addl. DG, DRI has been has been arrested in a Bribery Case.

It is important to note instead to grating Police Custody or to CBI Custody, vacation bench / Duty Magistrate has sent the accused to Judicial Custody with the following observations. 

Court not convinced that PC (CBI Custody) is at all required. Remanded  straight to JC. To be produced before regular Magistrate on 6th, Monday after Courts reopen

Arguments were heated. Sparks flew. Mr Chandrashekhar was heard by Duty Magistrate who emphasized that CBI has been used to scuttle a much larger fraud involving nearly ₹ 2000 crores of export benefits.  He produced letters written to higher ups which were not acted upon.

Mr. M S Arora, former PC and Mr. Rakesh Chitkara appeared before the Court to argue that he has been framed to remove him from investigations. Custody for 48 hours will lead to his automatic suspension.

Highlights 
1. Court was informed that Sh. Chander Shekhar is victim of conspiracy as he was investigating major fraud of ₹ 2000 crores and DGRI and DGGSTI were not following up on his reports.

2. Anup Joshi co accused  who provided money to another co accused for furtber delivery to Chandershekhar denied even knowing Chander Shekhar.

3. Third Co accused Dhanda stated he was to go to Dubai was forced by CBI to take money to Chander Shekhar  from Delhi to Ludhiana.

4. Court declined to give police custody as no ground for same was discernible and granted judicial custody till 6 th Jan 2020.

As per the sources, the Addl. DG DRI (the accursed) has written a secret letter the higher authority for further guidance and direction to make an investigation of fraud involving about ₹ 2000 of GST evasion by way of Circular Trading and fake invoicing. 

The petitioner/ Accursed argued before the Court that, higher authorities did not take any action on such secret note. 

Inputs from: Mr. Rakesh Chitkara, Advocate

 

 

Dated: 2-1-2020



 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates