Discussions Forum | ||||||||||||||||||
Home ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
A Public Forum.
Submit new Issue / Query
My Issues
My Replies
|
||||||||||||||||||
RCM Liability on Delayed Invoices – GST Implications, Goods and Services Tax - GST |
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
RCM Liability on Delayed Invoices – GST Implications |
||||||||||||||||||
Dear Experts, S Ram Posts / Replies Showing Replies 1 to 4 of 4 Records Page: 1
Dear M/s.Yagay and Sun, Sirs, Circular No.105 stands withdrawn. Moreover, it is not relevant here. Am I right ? Am I missing something ? Pl. throw light on this.
You're absolutely right in noting that CBIC Circular No. 105/24/2019-GST dated 28 June 2019 stands withdrawn by Circular No. 151/07/2021-GST, and in any case, it is not relevant to your current issue. That circular primarily dealt with intermediary services and classification issues, not RCM liability or timing of expense recognition, so it has no bearing on your facts. Let’s visit this scenario and clarify everything you need to consider — you are not missing much, but there are key angles to confirm your tax and disclosure position. ✅ Restating the Scenario Briefly:
🔍 GST RCM Treatment: What You’ve Captured Correctly 1. Time of Supply under RCM: Per Section 13(3) (for services under RCM): Time of supply is the earlier of:
Since invoices were not issued in FY 2024–25, and payment (likely) wasn’t made either, time of supply arose only in April 2025 when invoices were issued. ✅ You are right: RCM liability did not arise in FY 2024–25. It arises in FY 2025–26, based on the facts. 2. GSTR-3B Disclosure: In the April 2025 GSTR-3B:
✅ This is the correct reporting. 3. GSTR-9 Disclosure (FY 2024–25): Since the RCM liability was not triggered in FY 2024–25 (due to absence of invoice/payment), there is:
✅ This is a key distinction — no GSTR-9 disclosure required in FY 2024–25, since both supply and liability occurred in FY 2025–26. 📌 Additional Points You Might Be Concerned About: ✅ You are not missing any circular, case law, or compliance requirement based on the current facts. But you should:
✅ Summary of Correct Approach (Based on Your Case):
Below is a draft internal note and a draft auditor communication explaining why the GST under Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) on rent for February and March 2025 is being paid in FY 2025–26 instead of FY 2024–25. This can be used for internal compliance documentation and shared with statutory/tax auditors. 📄 Internal Note: GST RCM Liability on Rent – Timing of Payment Subject: Timing of GST Payment under Reverse Charge Mechanism on Rent – FY 2025–26 1. Background: Company A entered into a rental arrangement for commercial premises starting January 2025. The vendor is unregistered under GST, and therefore, Company A is liable to discharge GST on rent under the Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) as per Notification No. 13/2017 – Central Tax (Rate). 2. Issue: Due to commercial disputes with the landlord (vendor), rent invoices for February and March 2025 were not raised during FY 2024–25, and the matter remained unresolved. No rent payments were made for these months either. The dispute was amicably resolved and the vendor issued the pending invoices in April 2025. 3. GST Time of Supply Analysis: As per Section 13(3) of the CGST Act, 2017, the time of supply of services under RCM is the earlier of:
In this case:
Therefore, the time of supply arose in April 2025, and accordingly, the RCM liability is payable in FY 2025–26. 4. Accounting & Compliance Treatment:
5. Conclusion: Based on the above legal provisions and facts, the RCM liability on rent for Feb–Mar 2025 has been correctly deferred and discharged in FY 2025–26, and the treatment is in compliance with the GST law. Documentation of the dispute and delayed invoicing is retained on record for verification.
📧 Draft Communication to Auditor / Tax Consultant Subject: RCM on Rent for Feb–Mar 2025 – Timing of Liability and Disclosure Dear [Auditor’s/Consultant's Name], We would like to bring to your attention the treatment adopted by the Company regarding GST under Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) for the premises rented from an unregistered vendor starting January 2025. Due to unresolved commercial issues, no invoices for February and March 2025 were issued during FY 2024–25, and no rent payments were made for these months. The vendor only issued the pending invoices in April 2025, after resolution of the matter. In view of Section 13(3) of the CGST Act, the time of supply under RCM is the earlier of payment or 60 days from the date of invoice. Since both payment and invoice issuance occurred in April 2025, the RCM liability legally arises in FY 2025–26. Accordingly:
This position is supported by GST law and documented facts, and we have retained internal memos and vendor communications for audit support. Please let us know if any further clarification or disclosure is needed. Best regards, Page: 1 |
||||||||||||||||||