1987 (9) TMI 261

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... for the Respondents. [Order per : I.J. Rao, Member (T)]. - The Assistant Collector of Customs rejected the appellant's request for registration of Project Contract on the ground that there was no specific recommendatory letter from the sponsoring authority. The Appellate Collector upheld the order on the same ground. Hence this appeal. 2. The learned representative of the appellants submitted .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rned S.D.R. submits that the matter may be remanded to the Assistant Collector for verification of the correct position. 4. We have considered the arguments and facts. Following our earlier decisions cited by the appellants we accept that the letter of recommendation from the D.G.T.D. was not a mandatory requirement. The application for registration should not have been rejected for want of such .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X