9911796707
TMI Blog2010 (4) TMI 554X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... [Order]. - P.C. : Heard Counsel for the petitioners and Counsel for respondents no. 2 and 3. 2. The petitioners by this petition which is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and under Section 482 of the Cr .P.C. is challenging the order of issuance of process dated 7th January, 2010 and the summons dated 27th January, 2010 in a complaint Case No. 26/SW/2010. 3. A Show Cause Not ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... itioners herein, filed the complaint before the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Mumbai, on 7th January, 2010 and process was issued on the said complaint. 4. It is submitted by the learned Counsel for the petitioners that since the earlier order passed by the Settlement Commission dated 12th May, 2006 was subsequently set aside by this Court in the two writ petitions filed by the petiti ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the applications filed by the petitioners herein, liberty may be granted to the respondents to file a fresh complaint or in the alternative, the said complaint filed by the respondent may be stayed pending further orders by the Settlement Commission. 6. In my view, it would be appropriate if the said complaint is quashed since the applications which are filed by the petitioners before the Settle ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
