1992 (4) TMI 146

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... or the Respondents. [Order per : S.K. Bhatnagar, Vice President]. This is an appeal against the order of the Collector (Appeals), New Delhi, dated 19-9-1991. 2. Learned Advocate stated that the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of Raw Aluminium Castings falling under sub-heading No. 8714.00 and Dies falling under Heading 8207.00 of the Central Excise Tariff. 3. It was their c .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 7 and in the case of Abilash Rubber Products Another v. Collector of Central Excise, Hyderabad, reported in 1991 (56) E.L.T. 168 (Tri.) = 1991 (36) ECR 553 (CEGAT SRB), the department should have allowed their request. The Collector (Appeals) has, therefore, erred in rejecting their appeal. 5. The learned D.R. stated that the department has taken a correct stand in view of the language of the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X