TMI Blog1994 (11) TMI 202X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... er : G.P. Agarwal, Member (J)]. - When the case was called none appeared on behalf of the appellants. However, Shri P.M. Dave, Ld. Counsel for the appellants had requested for adjournment in his application dated 28-10-1994. For ready reference the said request is extracted as below in extenso :- "Application for adjournment The above appeal is fixed for hearing on 10-11-1994 by virtue of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t for adjournment. In a nutshell his submission was that the appeal be dismissed for default of appearance. 3. Considered. From the record we find that the submission made by the Ld. SDR is factually correct. After going through the reason for seeking adjournment we are of the view that it can hardly be a sufficient ground for adjournment. Consequently we dismiss the appeal for default of ap ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|