Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1995 (10) TMI 121

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... in the absence of evidence like balance sheet, profit and loss accounts  etc. with reference to the financial position. Taking note of the facts and circumstances  of the case and the  evidence on record and also considering the offer made by the  petitioner, we direct the petitioner to make pre-deposit of Rs. 25,00,000  (Rupees Twenty Five Lakhs) on or before 29th November, 1995 and report compliance subject to which pre-deposit of the balance amount would stand dispensed with pending appeal. 2. Smt. Nalini Chidambaram, the learned Senior Advocate appearing for the applicants pleaded that the applicants are manufacturers of 3 wheeled auto rickshaws falling under Tariff Heading 87.03 or 87.04. She pleaded that .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... sp; authority wherein the process of manufacture is set out as under : 1.A tabular frame is fabricated out of steel tubes. 2.Front body frame and back body frame are fabricated out of MS sheets. 3.Painting of tabular frame, front and back body frames. 4.Differential, front fork and tyres are fitted to the tubular frame. 5.The front body and back body are also mounted over the tubular frame. 6.Sheets and upholstery (top rexin cover) are fitted. 7.Battery is fitted and electrical connections are given. 8.In the last operation, the engine is fitted, gear box mounted on the frame and connected to the differentials. She pleaded that the process of the manufacturing of 3 wheeled auto rickshaw would show that no chassis as such came into .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ants should be given the benefit of Notification taking into consideration their manufacturing process. She pleaded that the applicants are entitled to arrange their manufacturing process in a manner so as to avail of the benefit of Notification and all that the applicants had done was a bit of tax planning to fall within the ambit of Notification 162/86. It was put to the learned counsel that in case from the auto rickshaw the body is lifted out and which could be easily detached, what would remain, she fairly stated that it would only be a chassis. She submitted that the applicants have a prima facie good case in their favour. 3. Regarding the financial position, the applicants did not produce the balance sheet and the learned advoc .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... onversion are cleared for manufacture of vehicles falling under Tariff 87.03 or 87.04. However, by Notification 162/86 in case of a manufacturer of auto rickshaws who does not manufacture chassis himself, and brings it from outside for the manufacture of vehicle falling under Tariff 87.03 and 87.04 and he does not avail of the benefit of credit provided for under Rule 56A or 57A, final duty required to be paid has been prescribed at concessional rate of Rs. 525/- per vehicle as against the statutory duty of Rs. 25% provided under Central Excise schedule. Thus it is seen that the scheme of the tariff is that where integrated operations are carried out for manufacture of vehicles coming under Tariff 87.03 and 87.04, including that of chassis, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... on the scope of the Notification. The appellants' plea is prima facie, repugnant of the scheme of the tariff. Just because the appellants have chosen to so arrange the manufacturing operations in such a manner that they fit the engine at the last stage they would be entitled to pay a lower rate of duty than in cases where order of fitment is otherwise than done by the appellants is prima facie not acceptable. Prima facie, therefore, we find no force in the plea of the applicants. We observe that in case the body of the auto rickshaws which is easily removable is taken out, what remains would be chassis. It is, therefore, clear that chassis comes into existence in the hands of the appellants. We also cannot prima facie visualise a situation .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates