1985 (1) TMI 226

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... yal, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S. Venkatesan, Senior Vice-President]. - This matter had previously come up on 7-12-1984. On that occasion the Bench had first taken up the question of limitation, since it had been submitted in the appeal that the show cause notice in this case was barred by limitation. The appellants' submission was that the amount of rebate was credited in their P.L .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... lea on limitation is not changed by the difference in the date). 3. In view of the evidence now before us we asked Shri Tayal whether he had any submissions to make regarding the plea of limitation raised by the appellants. Shri Tayal stated that, having regard to the decision of the Tribunal in other similar cases holding that the time limit would run from the date of credit, he would not h .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X