9911796707
TMI Blog2000 (7) TMI 341X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... der]. - The facts in brief in this appeal are that M/s. Gurind India (P) Ltd., Noida - the respondants herein, manufacture glass products falling under SH No. 70. Their factory premises were visited by the Central Excise officers on 18-10-93. On stock verification of the finished goods, the following discrepancies were noticed : (i) 57. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ss found short. He also imposed a penalty of Rs. 5,000/- on the party. 3. The party filed an appeal against the above order before Commissioner (Appeals), Ghaziabad. The appellate authority - but for upholding the penalty amount, allowed the appeal of the party setting aside the order passed by the Assistant Commissioner. 4. The Revenue is in appeal against the aforestated order of Com ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... idered the submissions made before. The Commissioner (Appeals), in his order dated 6-6-96 in this case, has granted relief to the party in following terms : "I have gone through the records of the case and considered the matter. It is a fact that product of the appellant i.e. glass is fragile in nature and occurrence of breakage, damage, scratch etc. is a common feature and further that nobody ca ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ngs in the order of the Commissioner are on appreciation of the facts before him. It is observed that excess quantity, of the finished goods was still within the factory premises and there is no allegation that this was intended to be removed without following the prescribed procedure or without payment of duty. The Assistant Commissioner has himself directed this quantity to be entered into the R ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
