9911796707
TMI Blog2000 (8) TMI 446X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r]. - These two appeals from the Revenue involved identical facts and are therefore taken up together for disposal. 2. Both respondents manufactured excisable goods and had accumulated Modvat credit of duty paid on the inputs. Since their production was exported they were eligible for grant of cash refund to the extent of unusable credit. On the applications being made the Jurisdictional A ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ower orders, the Revenue has filed the present appeals. 3 In the present appeals it is urged that the Assistant Commissioner did have authority to issue a show cause notice seeking recovery of the refund erroneously paid and that the show cause notices were issued within six months of the orders granting refund. Reliance is placed on ITC Ltd. v. Union of India [1988 (34) E.L.T. 473 (Cal.)]. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... I, however, find that the declaration having been filed on 8-9-1987, the credit must have been taken prior to that date. The taking of this credit is challenged in the show cause notice dated 3-1-1989. However, the show cause notice does not allege suppression etc., although, the demand is made in terms of Section 11A of the Act. The demand made under the show cause notice is therefore clearly bar ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
