Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1963 (6) TMI 26

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tions laid by the two appellants separately in O.S. Nos. 433 and 434 of 1954 to set aside the orders passed by the Subordinate Judge's Court, Nellore, in certain claim proceedings. For an appreciation of the contentions raised in these appeals, it is necessary to state a few material facts. In the year 1946, the appellant in L.P.A. No. 7 of 1962 and the appellant in L.P.A. No. 8 of 1962 who owned the transport vehicles, M.D.L. No. 564 and M.D.L. No. 428 and several others, formed a limited company called the Nellore Bus Transport Ltd., in which the transport vehicles belonging to the shareholders were pooled together and operated as. a fleet. One Subbarayudu, respondent in both the appeals, travelled in one of these vehicles, M.D.L. No. 428 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ers on the claim petitions on the allegation that the decree obtained against a defunct company was a nullity and that, at any rate, it could not be executed against the shareholders, who were entities distinct from the limited company. The suits were resisted by the defendant on the pleas that they were not maintainable, the remedy available to the plaintiffs being the one provided under section 47, Civil Procedure Code, that the decree was not a nullity and that, at any rate, it could be executed against the plaintiffs who, by withholding the information about the voluntary liquidation of the company, prevented the defendant from pursuing the remedies available to him urder law. The second objection prevailed with the District Munsiff w .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... not be levied against the properties of the appellants and even assuming that fraud was committed by the appellants, the only remedy available to the judgment-creditor was the one provided by section 243 of the Indian Companies Act, 1913. When an enactment has provided a special remedy to enforce the rights of a party, it is only that remedy that could be taken advantage of by any person and an ordinary action in a court of law could not be maintained to enforce such rights, continues the learned counsel. To substantiate this proposition, the learned counsel cited to us the rulings in Durga Shankar v. Raghuraj Singh [1955] 1 S.C.R. 267 Guruvayur Devaswom v. Kuttikrishnan AIR 1956 Mad. 388 and Rashid Jamshed Sons & Co. v. Moolchand Jolhaje .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... argued by Sri Kuppuswamy, learned counsel for the respondent, that having committed fraud and prevented the respondent from taking steps to invoke the section, it is not open to the appellants to take advantage of their fraud and plead that since the decreeholder had failed to have recourse to section 243 he is disabled from taking action to realise the fruits of his decree. This doctrine is based on the doctrine of equitable estoppel. In fact, it is this that has appealed to both the courts below and our learned brother. Dealing with the issue whether the appellants were guilty of fraud, this is what the lower appellate court stated and which has been extracted by our learned brother in his judgment: "Keeping back the liquidation procee .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... wherever they exist and has rightly attached the two buses as those of the N.B.T. Company who is the second defendant in O.S. No. 3 of 1949." These observations make it abundantly clear that the appellants were guilty of fraud. This finding of fact which is binding on us and, in fact, which has not been challenged, stands in the way of the appellants building an argument on section 243. As a result of their conduct, the voluntary liquidation is of no avail to them, and the judgment-creditor could proceed on the footing of there being no liquidation for the purpose of execution of his decree. In a similar situation, a Bench of the Madras High Court ruled in Mrs. N. Wapskare v. Pierce Leslie & Co. [1960] 2 M.L.J. 401, 412 that when the def .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates