9911796707
TMI Blog2001 (9) TMI 691X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... i T.D. Bodade, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Gowri Shankar, Member (T)]. - Swastik Intermediates Pvt. Ltd., the appellant before us, manufactured dye intermediates. It availed benefit of the Modvat Scheme and, took credit of the duty paid on inputs that it received in the manufacture of the dye intermediates. Among these is beta naphthol. The manufacturers of the beta naphthol from whom ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n merits, the appellant has no case. Its advocate accepts that, the earlier decisions of the Tribunal in Syn-O-Chem Products v. CCE unreported order 4993, and decision in CCE v. Abhideep Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. [1998 (102) E.L.T. 105], decide against the appellant. We however note that the demand for duty is barred by limitation. The show cause notice dated 9-1-1995 issued to the appellant related to ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e department from this endorsement, therefore, that part of the duty was not available as credit. This, however, cannot be said of the gate passes of the other suppliers. One of the manufacturers, Beta Chemicals, indicated in its gate passes that part of the duty had been paid from "set-off" register. It is however not possible to say what this "set-off" register related to and not necessarily cor ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
