TMI Blog2001 (2) TMI 974X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y Anjan Biswas, Advocates, for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. - After rejecting the Stay Petition filed by the Revenue, we take up the appeal itself with the consent of both sides. 2. Vide the impugned order, the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Guwahati has set aside the order of the Assistant Commissioner confirming the demand of duty against the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... in favour of the respondents. The said appeal was disposed of by the Tribunal vide Order No. A-1641/CAL/2000, dated 26-9-2000. Vide the said order, the Tribunal by following the earlier order of the Honourable High Court of Andhra Pradesh in the case of Charminar Non-Wovens Ltd. v. C.C.Ex. reported in [2001 (129) E.L.T. 312 (A.P.) = 1998 (25) RLT 445], had rejected the appeal filed by the Revenue ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... in the earlier appeals filed by the Revenue.
5. In view of the fact that there is no stay of operation of the earlier orders by the Honourable Supreme Court, we do not intend to keep the proceedings in abeyance and as such, by following the earlier order, we uphold the impugned order and reject the Revenue's appeal. Stay Petition also gets disposed of. X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|