2003 (10) TMI 492

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rder per : P.G. Chacko, Member (J)]. - This application, which says that there are apparent mistakes in paragraphs 6, 7 and 8 of Final Order No. 112-115/99-B2, dated 28-5-1999 passed by this Tribunal in Appeal Nos. C/930-933/93-B2 [1999 (112) E.L.T. 314 (Tri.)], has been submitted by the Consultant for Shri Harinder Singh, one of the appellants. 2. Examined the records and heard both the s .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he Final Order and examined the submissions. In the Final Order under consideration, the Tribunal set side the absolute confiscation of the vehicle as also the penalty on the appellant. The vehicle was allowed to be redeemed against payment of appropriate fine. Obviously, "absolute confiscation" was substituted with "confiscation with option for redemption on payment of fine". The Consultant has f .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... case as well as the relevant provisions of law. It appears from the text and tenor of the present application that the appellant wants to say that there is an error of judgment in the Final Order of this Tribunal. But any error of judgment can be rectified only by the appellate court, and not by this Tribunal under Section 129B(2). 5. In the result, the application is rejected.
Case laws .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X