TMI Blog2008 (5) TMI 403X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... under section 560(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking directions to the respondent (Registrar of Companies) to restore its name to the register of the companies. Briefly stated the facts of the case are as follow: Petitioner No. 1 is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956. Petitioner No. 2 is stated to be one of its directors. Petitioner No. 1 company was incorporated on 18-11-1 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ct, 1956 with Registrar of Companies to strike off its name from the register of the companies. Before the request of petitioner No. 1 company to strike off its name from the register of the company was examined and decision taken thereon by the Registrar of Companies, change took place in the management of the said company and pursuant to the said change and considering the business prospects, th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... behalf of the Registrar of Companies. Mr. Malik appearing on behalf of the respondent says that he has instructions from his client to state that the Registrar of Companies has no objection to the restoration of the name of petitioner No. 1 company to the register of companies subject to payment of additional fee to be levied by the Registrar of Companies for permitting petitioner No. 1 company to ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|