2004 (6) TMI 364

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... pondent. [Order]. - The appellants made a prayer to decide the appeal on the basis of written submission filed by them. Accordingly, I have heard Shri A.K. Saxena, ld. JDR for the Revenue. 2. Vide his impugned order the lower authorities have confirmed the demand of duty of Rs. 6,921/- against M/s. Kapoor Machinery Stores along with imposition of penalty of identical amount under Section .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... urse of adjudication it was found that the invoices were issued covering the entire consignment but due to mistake the same were not handed over to the transporters. On subsequent enquiries the same were produced to the visiting officers. The said invoices have been raised in respect of the goods in question and debit entries made in RG 23A Part II. The same was submitted along with RT 12 returns .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... observed that the appellant's plea that invoices have been raised for the said goods and therefore it does not warrant confiscation is not acceptable, inasmuch as rectifying one's lapse of fatal nature, do not wipe away its ill-effects. 5. I do not agree with the above reasoning of Commissioner (Appeals). When the goods were duty paid and the debit duly recorded, confiscation of goods in qu .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X