TMI Blog2007 (5) TMI 494X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he revenue challenging the order of Commissioner (Appeals) dated 16-10-2006. 2. In the impugned order, the Commissioner has set aside the order in original of the lower authorities on the following grounds as mentioned in para 6 and 7 of the said Order-in-Appeal : 6. I have carefully gone through the records of the case, grounds of appeal of the appellant and record of submissions made at the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... managed the documents pertaining to some other consignment licitly imported by them, to cover up the contravention in this case. 7. It is pointed out that while deciding the appeal of M/s. B.R. Silks, in the same case, vide Order-in-Appeal No. 06-CUS/Alld/2006 dated 13-3-2006, after citing and discussing important judgments pronounced by the Tribunal, it was observed that the departmental a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... this order, the Revenue has contested the Commissioner (Appeals) s finding that the Department had failed to discharge the burden of proof that the seized goods i.e. silk fabrics is smuggled one. In Para (d) of the grounds of appeal, the Revenue is stating that the issuance of challan creates doubt because the import documents if available with the respondents regarding legal import / posses ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
