2007 (3) TMI 622

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... erjee, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri Y.S. Loni, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Chittaranjan Satapathy, Member (T)]. Heard both sides. 2. These appeals arise from a common order and hence are taken together for disposal. Shri S.K. Bagaria, ld. Sr. Advocate appearing for the appellants states that there are two issues involved. As regards the small issue of a demand relati .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... is not aware of any challenge to the said order passed in revision. In view of the fact that the duty concession has been allowed by the Revisionary Authority and the same is not in dispute, we order that similar treatment be extended in respect of the cases before us. The appeals are allowed in the above terms. The duty demand relating to the valuation issue, is upheld and the same is to be adju .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X