TMI Blog2008 (9) TMI 854X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Shri P.M. Dave, Advocate, for the Appellant. Ms. M.I.J. Micheal, Jt. CDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. - After hearing both sides in detail, we find that the present miscellaneous application stand filed before us for reconstruction of the appeal, which the appellant claimed, as filed before Tribunal Delhi in the year 1986 and which is reported to have ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... assed by C.C.E. (A) Mumbai are being sent. The said letter along with the 5 sets of appeals were sent in the same envelope under which another letter dated 18-6-96 removing defects pointed out by Registry in another appeal were sent by their group company M/s. Milcent Appliances P. Ltd. There is no dispute about the receipt of another document sent on behalf of the M/s. Milcent Appliances P. Ltd. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... that the appellants were accordingly informed by their jurisdictional Central Excise authorities, who made personal enquiry in the Tribunal s registry at New Delhi and also filed various letters, reiterating their claim that the appeal was indeed filed and must have been lost in the Tribunal s registry. 2. It is in the background of the above development, writ petition was ultimately filed befo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
