1971 (6) TMI 49

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... supplied such goods to their customers outside the State of Maharashtra but the Sales Tax Officer assessed them on the footing that they had acted merely as agents of the buyers while importing the goods. The contention of the respondents that the sales were effected by them during the course of import was rejected. It must he mentioned that the respondents used to submit tenders to the buyers an .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... lso, that the sales would fall within section 5(2). But it was contended on behalf of the department that the sales would also fall under section 3 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, as having been effected in the course of inter-State trade or commerce. This latter contention has been rejected by the Tribunal in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court in K.G. Khosla v. The Deputy Commissioner .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X