TMI Blog1972 (6) TMI 66X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... acking material was subjected to tax. The petitioners objected to this assessment and filed an appeal against the order contending that the entire turnover represented the sale of snuff and there was no sale of packing material as such. It may be mentioned that in the bills for sale of snuff the packing materials have not been separately specified and charged by the petitioners. The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. The Tribunal confirmed the order. In this revision petition, the petitioners contended that the packing materials were given to the customers free and the price charged in the bill represented only the cost of the snuff and that they had no intention to sell the packing materials. As held by the Sup ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ller as a convenient and cheap vehicle of transport. He may also have to consider the question whether, when a trader in cigarettes sold cigarettes priced at a particular figure for a specified number and handed them over to a customer in a cheap cardboard container of insignificant value, he intended to sell the cardboard container and the customer intended to buy the same? It is not possible to state as a proposition of law that whenever particular goods were sold in a container the parties did not intend to sell and buy the container also. Many cases may be visualised where the container is comparatively of high value and, sometimes even higher than that contained in it. Scent or whisky may be sold in costly containers. Even cigarettes m ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... containers as shown in the accounts is nearly 10 percent. of the value of the goods sold. It could not, therefore, be stated that the containers were of insignificant value. The goods were sold as packed and, therefore, the price includes the value of the container also. The Tribunal has also found that the sale price included the value of the packing material. The learned counsel for the petitioners contended that there will be no resale value for the containers to the purchasers and, therefore, it could not have been the intention of the parties to purchase and sell the containers. Apart from the fact that there is no evidence to show that the containers had no value to the purchasers, since the sale was as packed with the container and ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
